The major emerging issue to be discussed in the context of the biological interactions of nanoparticles is related to those particles with little or no solubility, or being non- degradable at the locality where accumulation is observed. There remain many unknown details about the interaction of nanoparticles and biological systems.
There is not a single study showing that the messenger RNA is broken down
Yes there is a general dread around family and friends who took the early shots. I'd say 50% realise they shot made them unwell. They don't know what is wrong because sadly both the mind and the body are affected by the LNP. It's one of those situations where it affects everyone differently and the fact that all the government think tanks are unsure of the end result means they knew it was unsafe. Now is the major effort to use every arm of the government to cover it up because what do you do? They signed a contract.
All any on us can do now is try to help them. You are doing your best.
A special category of fibres are nanotubes, which may be of a few nanometres in diameter but with a length that could be several micrometers. Risks should be assessed bearing in mind the well known carcinogenic effects of certain asbestos fibres. In two recently published in vivo studies, single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) were demonstrated to induce lung granulomas after intratracheal administration (Lam 2004, Warheit et al 2004), indicating that these nanotubes cannot be classified as a new form of graphite on material safety data sheets. On a dose per mass basis the nanotubes were more toxic than quartz particles, well known for their lung toxicity, although the mass dose was very high and mechanical blockage of some airways was noted. Carbon black, carbonyl iron and graphite produced no significant adverse effects. Multifocal granulomatous lesions were observed without accompanying inflammation, cell proliferation or cytotoxicity, which was suggested to indicate a potentially new mechanism of pulmonary toxicity and injury by the nanotubes, not following the normal paradigm of toxic dusts (Warheit et al 2004). In vitro studies using a human keratinocyte cell line showed that carbon nanotube exposure resulted in accelerated oxidative stress and cellular toxicity, which may be interpreted as potential for dermal toxicity (Shvedova et al 2003).
I'm more concerned that the rise in mental illness may be tied to lipid nanoparticles causing brain damage.
Essentially vaccinated people are at risk of cognitive decline:
https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/opinions_layman/en/nanotechnologies/l-3/6-health-effects-nanoparticles.htm
This is where the increases could be coming in.
Yes there is a general dread around family and friends who took the early shots. I'd say 50% realise they shot made them unwell. They don't know what is wrong because sadly both the mind and the body are affected by the LNP. It's one of those situations where it affects everyone differently and the fact that all the government think tanks are unsure of the end result means they knew it was unsafe. Now is the major effort to use every arm of the government to cover it up because what do you do? They signed a contract.
All any on us can do now is try to help them. You are doing your best.
Interesting reference to asbestos.
Don't get your medical advice from anonymous cartoon lovers on social media folks.