Side effects related to the immune action of COVID-19 vaccines reported thus far include allergy reactions and autoimmunity. According to the CDC, among the current allergy reactions, fatal anaphylaxis has occurred at a rate of approximately five cases per million vaccine doses administered16,46. An increasing number of studies have suggested that adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines could include myocarditis47, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia48, IgA vasculitis49, autoimmune disorders50, and others51. It is still unclear whether there is a causative connection between the COVID-19 vaccine and autoimmune symptoms.
LNP is lipid nanoparticles
PEG is polyethylene glycol
Except that if you follow the footnotes you'll see that the link in #16 is broken, presumably because the CDC page has been moved since the article was submitted for publication. The current CDC item on "Anaphylaxis after COVID-19 Vaccination" lists several studies, none of which report a fatality: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html
Footnote #46 does not mention "fatal" either, just "At the time of this writing, the rates of anaphylaxis are calculated at 5.0 cases per million for the Pfizer-BioNTech and 2.8 cases per million for the Moderna vaccine": https://www.jacionline.org/action/showPdf?pii=S0091-6749%2821%2900565-0
Nature is not known for hyperbole and a huge miss by them like that is not normal. The fact that link 16 is broken is troublesome. The authors would've needed to back up the citation with evidence to be published. Why is the evidence broken?
You should take it up with Nature and see if they stand behind that statement.
Nature is not known for hyperbole and a huge miss by them like that is not normal
You would have found it if you'd done your reading.
Why is the evidence broken?
Because HTML does not fix broken links. If the paper links to a CDC page on Sept 23 and the CDC reorganizes their site on the 24th then the link is broken.
You can use webarchive.org to see the link on July 13 2023. No mention of fatalities, just "5 cases per one million vaccine doses administered"
You should take it up with Nature and see if they stand behind that statement.
Why would I take it up with Nature when I can read the original papers? Nature isn't going to redo the studies, they just report "so-and-so says this happened". Not all of their articles are peer-reviewed.
LNP is lipid nanoparticles PEG is polyethylene glycol
https://covid19tracker.ca/vaccinationtracker.html
101,617,113 doses administered means 508 Canadians were killed based on the rate of anaphylaxis death.
That's from just one side effect.
Except that if you follow the footnotes you'll see that the link in #16 is broken, presumably because the CDC page has been moved since the article was submitted for publication. The current CDC item on "Anaphylaxis after COVID-19 Vaccination" lists several studies, none of which report a fatality: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html
Footnote #46 does not mention "fatal" either, just "At the time of this writing, the rates of anaphylaxis are calculated at 5.0 cases per million for the Pfizer-BioNTech and 2.8 cases per million for the Moderna vaccine": https://www.jacionline.org/action/showPdf?pii=S0091-6749%2821%2900565-0
Nature is not known for hyperbole and a huge miss by them like that is not normal. The fact that link 16 is broken is troublesome. The authors would've needed to back up the citation with evidence to be published. Why is the evidence broken?
You should take it up with Nature and see if they stand behind that statement.
You would have found it if you'd done your reading.
Because HTML does not fix broken links. If the paper links to a CDC page on Sept 23 and the CDC reorganizes their site on the 24th then the link is broken.
You can use webarchive.org to see the link on July 13 2023. No mention of fatalities, just "5 cases per one million vaccine doses administered"
Why would I take it up with Nature when I can read the original papers? Nature isn't going to redo the studies, they just report "so-and-so says this happened". Not all of their articles are peer-reviewed.