The State of Kansas outlines several specific allegations in its lawsuit:
Pfizer misled the public that it had a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine.
Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public.
Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was effective even though it knew its COVID19 vaccine waned over time and did not protect against COVID-19 variants. Pfizer concealed this critical effectiveness information from the public.
Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission of COVID-19 even though it knew it never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission of COVID-19.
To keep the public from learning the truth, Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its COVID-19 vaccine.
Pfizer’s misrepresentations of a “safe and effective” vaccine resulted in record company revenue of approximately $75 billion from COVID-19 vaccine sales in just two years.
Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated previous consent judgments with the State of Kansas.
Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, K.S.A. 50-623 et seq., regardless of whether any individual consumer ultimately received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
Pfizer must be held accountable for falsely representing the benefits of its COVID19 vaccine while concealing and suppressing the truth about its vaccine’s safety risks, waning effectiveness, and inability to prevent transmission.
It's almost as though she doesn't know that the risk of myocarditis from covid is about seven times higher folks.
"risk–benefit assessments have determined that the benefits of using mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines outweigh the risks of myocarditis" https://www.cmaj.ca/content/194/45/E1529
"Despite the small but finite risk of vaccine-induced myocarditis, the benefits of protection against COVID-19 disease and its attendant complications far outweigh the risks." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596182/
"Compared with myocarditis associated with covid-19 disease and conventional myocarditis, myocarditis after vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines was associated with better clinical outcomes within 90 days of admission to hospital." https://bmjmedicine.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000373
But that's just the science, and most people here on OmegaCanada just laugh at that.
In the US - for comparison - a lung transplant costs close to a million dollars.
Australian girl: "I'd like one of those free Australia organ transplants please."
Australia healthcare system: "Sure. No problem. You're going to be on drugs that suppress your immune system so that your body doesn't reject the new organs. That means you're going to be extra extra vulnerable to hospitalization and death from covid, so we'd like you to get a covid vaccine."
Australian girl: "No."
Australian healthcare system: "Now we have a problem."
Why would a government risk scarce healthcare dollars on someone who refuses to follow medical advice?
And don't forget: it was the girl who stopped the process by saying "No".
The real question is why would a government violate by coercion (this case is a great example) the fundamental human right of bodily autonomy for a jab that was at best ineffective and at worst deadly? Especially now that the supposed pandemic is over in that poor girl’s case? It takes a special kind of evil to condone that. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Trotting out all the old cult cliches without a shred of proof. OmegaCanada is awash in unsupported opinions from people you don't know who have no apparent medical qualifications folks.
bodily autonomy for a jab
People had the right to refuse it if they could handle the consequences of ignoring the advice of experts.
at best ineffective
An unsupported opinion. Meanwhile the studies are quite clear...
If DreamerD actually had any proof to back up her unsupported opinion it would illustrate that the rareness of mortality from the vaccines made the risk minuscule compared to refusing them.
the supposed pandemic is over in that poor girl’s case
She says that as though covid has gone away. And as though there were no other factors involved in the decision. She should read up on Dazelle Peters' medical condition.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
She should educate herself, rather than getting into a lather based on what she reads on OmegaCanada.
"People had the right to refuse it if they could handle the consequences of ignoring the advice of experts."
That is one of the most intellectually bankrupt arguments of the scamdemic and there were many. It also seems to be the favorite of communists and antifa when they brutalize people for their ideas.
"An unsupported opinion. Meanwhile the studies are quite clear..."
You are either dishonest or were asleep from 2020 to 2023.
You made to effort to link to studies that showed reduced immunity in those who got mRNA injections. Your ScienceTM is the same tired corrupt debunked propaganda we heard from government shills for years.
Yes this is pure evil and I’m very proud to support this homicide.
I wonder how many doctors went to court to fight for the right to put her to death?
I support homicide
As an insane Leftist, I love doctors who kill their patients
The State of Kansas outlines several specific allegations in its lawsuit:
Pfizer misled the public that it had a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine.
Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public.
Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was effective even though it knew its COVID19 vaccine waned over time and did not protect against COVID-19 variants. Pfizer concealed this critical effectiveness information from the public.
Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission of COVID-19 even though it knew it never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission of COVID-19.
To keep the public from learning the truth, Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its COVID-19 vaccine.
Pfizer’s misrepresentations of a “safe and effective” vaccine resulted in record company revenue of approximately $75 billion from COVID-19 vaccine sales in just two years.
Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated previous consent judgments with the State of Kansas.
Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, K.S.A. 50-623 et seq., regardless of whether any individual consumer ultimately received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
Pfizer must be held accountable for falsely representing the benefits of its COVID19 vaccine while concealing and suppressing the truth about its vaccine’s safety risks, waning effectiveness, and inability to prevent transmission.
Don't worry, purebloods get plenty of laughs out of the millions of vaxxies and their heart problems.
Tuchodi is proud that doctors are putting their patients to death.
As an elderly homicidal Marxist, we love murder and death
It's almost as though she doesn't know that the risk of myocarditis from covid is about seven times higher folks.
"risk–benefit assessments have determined that the benefits of using mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines outweigh the risks of myocarditis" https://www.cmaj.ca/content/194/45/E1529
"Despite the small but finite risk of vaccine-induced myocarditis, the benefits of protection against COVID-19 disease and its attendant complications far outweigh the risks." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9596182/
"Compared with myocarditis associated with covid-19 disease and conventional myocarditis, myocarditis after vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines was associated with better clinical outcomes within 90 days of admission to hospital." https://bmjmedicine.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000373
But that's just the science, and most people here on OmegaCanada just laugh at that.
No court involved folks. The young lady stopped the process.
BTW: First class misinformation specialist here:
"Peter Imanuelsen (born September 27, 1994), better known as Peter Sweden, is a British far-right speaker and activist. Imanuelsen was originally a Holocaust denier[2] white nationalist, extreme-homophobe, (former?) Flat Earther,[3] (former?) Moon landing denialist,[3] Islamophobe and conspiracy theorist crank who has written that Jews and the Vatican are behind a New World Order."
I wonder if Canadude tells her friends she believes a flat earther?
Lung transplants are free in Australia.
In the US - for comparison - a lung transplant costs close to a million dollars.
Australian girl: "I'd like one of those free Australia organ transplants please."
Australia healthcare system: "Sure. No problem. You're going to be on drugs that suppress your immune system so that your body doesn't reject the new organs. That means you're going to be extra extra vulnerable to hospitalization and death from covid, so we'd like you to get a covid vaccine."
Australian girl: "No."
Australian healthcare system: "Now we have a problem."
Why would a government risk scarce healthcare dollars on someone who refuses to follow medical advice?
And don't forget: it was the girl who stopped the process by saying "No".
She's avoiding the question folks.
I'll ask it again:
Why would a government risk scarce healthcare dollars on someone who refuses to follow medical advice?
The real question is why would a government violate by coercion (this case is a great example) the fundamental human right of bodily autonomy for a jab that was at best ineffective and at worst deadly? Especially now that the supposed pandemic is over in that poor girl’s case? It takes a special kind of evil to condone that. You should be ashamed of yourself.
every statistic I paste falsely labels vaccinated people with one or two shots within 2 weeks as “unvaccinated”
so all my posts is based on garbage in garbage out government stats
as a contagious covid vector and diseased boomer, I am easy to brainwash
it is my opinion your kid needs to be injected with myocarditis.
I love when doctors go to court because they want to murder their transplant patients who have natural immunity
See your yourself folks
Ho hum.
Trotting out all the old cult cliches without a shred of proof. OmegaCanada is awash in unsupported opinions from people you don't know who have no apparent medical qualifications folks.
People had the right to refuse it if they could handle the consequences of ignoring the advice of experts.
An unsupported opinion. Meanwhile the studies are quite clear...
August 2023 National Center for Biotechnology Information "The risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes reduced after receiving the booster"
August 2023 National Center for Biotechnology Information "Vaccination remains a crucial strategy to mitigate the severity of the disease and reduce mortality rates"
January 2023 The Lancet "COVID-19 vaccination is effective at preventing severe illness and complications during pregnancy"
November 2022 The Journal of Infectious Diseases "COVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower rates of ICU admission and in-hospital death in both Delta and Omicron periods compared with being unvaccinated."
And so on...
If DreamerD actually had any proof to back up her unsupported opinion it would illustrate that the rareness of mortality from the vaccines made the risk minuscule compared to refusing them.
She says that as though covid has gone away. And as though there were no other factors involved in the decision. She should read up on Dazelle Peters' medical condition.
She should educate herself, rather than getting into a lather based on what she reads on OmegaCanada.
"People had the right to refuse it if they could handle the consequences of ignoring the advice of experts."
That is one of the most intellectually bankrupt arguments of the scamdemic and there were many. It also seems to be the favorite of communists and antifa when they brutalize people for their ideas.
"An unsupported opinion. Meanwhile the studies are quite clear..."
You are either dishonest or were asleep from 2020 to 2023.
Unsupported personal options from some anonymous poster folks.
No attempt to respond to the science.
A few random nits and bytes among the gazillions on the Internet.
Nothing to see here.
You made to effort to link to studies that showed reduced immunity in those who got mRNA injections. Your ScienceTM is the same tired corrupt debunked propaganda we heard from government shills for years.