I love how they worded it where it's okay to dog on somebody in a 'majority' position, but not vise versa.
Does that mean that I can go to /r/CanadaLeft and shit all over their sub with my conservative-libertarian beliefs, and they can't do a damn thing about it? Not fucking likely.
Once again, more soft bigotry of low expectations. Minorities are defenseless and not as 'privilaged' as whiteys and therefor need extra protections.
Absolute bullshit. You either protect everyone equally or no one at all.
Marginalized or vulnerable groups include, but are not limited to, groups based on their actual and perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, immigration status, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, pregnancy, or disability. These include victims of a major violent event and their families.
per·ceive
/pərˈsēv/
verb
past tense: perceived; past participle: perceived
become aware or conscious of (something); come to realize or understand.
"his mouth fell open as he perceived the truth"
Why is that even there? If I perceived that I am of another type of group above thus I should be protected but if my actual group is a majority, I am not protected. So what is it? Protected or not? Doesn't make any sense but seeing that the radicals who run Retarddit are flamboyant hypocrites, I shouldn't be surprised.
Isn't is just so fucking bizarre how they oh so casually just toss in there "yeah but rules against hate don't apply to this group", as though that is a perfectly normal thing to do? And then they follow it up with 'helpful examples' so outrageously exaggerated that they make the whole thing even more cringe?
Yeah, you'd think explicitly authorizing racism towards a particular race would be completely outrageous to any reasonable person. We've fallen pretty far in the last five years.
I love how they worded it where it's okay to dog on somebody in a 'majority' position, but not vise versa.
Does that mean that I can go to /r/CanadaLeft and shit all over their sub with my conservative-libertarian beliefs, and they can't do a damn thing about it? Not fucking likely.
Once again, more soft bigotry of low expectations. Minorities are defenseless and not as 'privilaged' as whiteys and therefor need extra protections.
Fake, gay, and lame.
Absolute bullshit. You either protect everyone equally or no one at all.
Marginalized or vulnerable groups include, but are not limited to, groups based on their actual and perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, immigration status, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, pregnancy, or disability. These include victims of a major violent event and their families.
per·ceive
/pərˈsēv/
verb
past tense: perceived; past participle: perceived
Why is that even there? If I perceived that I am of another type of group above thus I should be protected but if my actual group is a majority, I am not protected. So what is it? Protected or not? Doesn't make any sense but seeing that the radicals who run Retarddit are flamboyant hypocrites, I shouldn't be surprised.
Can't wait to go back to reddit and shitpost relentlessly against communist Chinese women.
Women are the majority in Canada. Does that mean redditors can start criticizing feminism now?
No because men hold the majority of power and privilege.
Isn't is just so fucking bizarre how they oh so casually just toss in there "yeah but rules against hate don't apply to this group", as though that is a perfectly normal thing to do? And then they follow it up with 'helpful examples' so outrageously exaggerated that they make the whole thing even more cringe?
Holy fuck, what a demented world we live in.
Yeah, you'd think explicitly authorizing racism towards a particular race would be completely outrageous to any reasonable person. We've fallen pretty far in the last five years.
Expect to see this kind of thing more and more.
That's left purposely vague because leftist shitstains perfectly know they're telling bullshit and just want to hate themselves and other whites.
Majority share holders!