I'm kind of suspicious of any news source that needs to plaster it's images in watermarks.

This manual looks like it could have hastily been written and printed by anyone, not to mention that a lot of it reads more like a what right-wing person thinks ANTIFA would say rather than how ANTIFA would phrase these things, and we only have Intellihub's statement that it's ANTIFA's manual as evidence.

Does anyone know anything about the credibility of Intellihub? This is the first time I hear of them.