No, they're communists.
National socialism and communism are radically different ideas despite being ultra-left wing, requiring massive federal oversight and treating perceived traitors (often ethnic minorities) with brutality.
To put it mildly, national socialism seeks to provide a protected way forward for the perceived "people who constitute" the nation and seeks to have them flourish through strong governmental oversight, fascism seeks to do the same only with far more governmental oversight while communism seeks to ensure total equality through total government oversight.
The difference between national socialism and communism in a nutshell, is that a national socialist government seeks to provide their citizens with the option to have a good job, with vacations and housing while communism seeks to force people to work a job that will enhance the nation's success.
There's a reason why national socialism was so admired by the Liberals (check out Pierre Trudeau during WWII for example) while communism is only admired by the worst of politicians (check out Pierre Trudeau during his tenure for example.)
The problem with both systems is that they're both far-left, overly federalist philosophies which concentrate power in a government that is disconnected from the people themselves. Had WWII not happened, national socialism would have burnt itself out in the same way as communism over the years.
They're both flawed systems with a fair number of similarities, but they are distinct in very important ways.
Hence the inevitability that Molotov-Ribbentrov pact would be betrayed, leading to the Eastern Front. They're similar enough that they have roughly the same lefty goals, but different enough that they can't exist simultaneously without a fight for left-wing supremacy.
You're missing the key differences. Despite being both ultra-federalistic, extreme left-wing philosophies they're diametrically opposed.
The real difference is that National Socialism looks at the nation, declares that they're descended from a great history and seeks to connect with the traditionalism of the nation in order to seize extreme levels of control and justify their actions, while communism declares that they're descended from a shameful history that must be obliterated and seeks to create a new, fair history in order to seize extreme levels of control and justify their actions.
I hate using this example, but one has to look at the persecutions that both regimes conduct to understand them. Germany persecuted the Jews, stripped them of their wealth and sent them to labour camps for their perceived historical acts against the German people while the Soviet Union persecuted the Jews stripped them of their wealth and sent them to labour camps for their perceived acts against the current State.
Both philosophies committed the same act for the same reason (so the government could strip them of their wealth) but the reasoning is very different.
One is the past glories and greatness of history, while the other is past oppressions the desire to create a new history.
They can't exist together in harmony, and a regime can't go from one philosophy to the other. It's too big of an ideological divide to be bridged.
Fuck me, no.
Stop reading Stormfront bullshit and puking it all over the internet like a retard.
If you want to talk history then learn history. If not, then don't and then you won't get baited by a bunch of retards into spewing their insane rhetoric.
Fuck's sake.
National Socialism and Communism are not the same thing.
There was a war over that particular ideological dispute. It wasn't great.
No, they're communists.
National socialism and communism are radically different ideas despite being ultra-left wing, requiring massive federal oversight and treating perceived traitors (often ethnic minorities) with brutality.
To put it mildly, national socialism seeks to provide a protected way forward for the perceived "people who constitute" the nation and seeks to have them flourish through strong governmental oversight, fascism seeks to do the same only with far more governmental oversight while communism seeks to ensure total equality through total government oversight.
The difference between national socialism and communism in a nutshell, is that a national socialist government seeks to provide their citizens with the option to have a good job, with vacations and housing while communism seeks to force people to work a job that will enhance the nation's success.
There's a reason why national socialism was so admired by the Liberals (check out Pierre Trudeau during WWII for example) while communism is only admired by the worst of politicians (check out Pierre Trudeau during his tenure for example.)
The problem with both systems is that they're both far-left, overly federalist philosophies which concentrate power in a government that is disconnected from the people themselves. Had WWII not happened, national socialism would have burnt itself out in the same way as communism over the years.
They're both flawed systems with a fair number of similarities, but they are distinct in very important ways.
Hence the inevitability that Molotov-Ribbentrov pact would be betrayed, leading to the Eastern Front. They're similar enough that they have roughly the same lefty goals, but different enough that they can't exist simultaneously without a fight for left-wing supremacy.
You're missing the key differences. Despite being both ultra-federalistic, extreme left-wing philosophies they're diametrically opposed.
The real difference is that National Socialism looks at the nation, declares that they're descended from a great history and seeks to connect with the traditionalism of the nation in order to seize extreme levels of control and justify their actions, while communism declares that they're descended from a shameful history that must be obliterated and seeks to create a new, fair history in order to seize extreme levels of control and justify their actions.
I hate using this example, but one has to look at the persecutions that both regimes conduct to understand them. Germany persecuted the Jews, stripped them of their wealth and sent them to labour camps for their perceived historical acts against the German people while the Soviet Union persecuted the Jews stripped them of their wealth and sent them to labour camps for their perceived acts against the current State.
Both philosophies committed the same act for the same reason (so the government could strip them of their wealth) but the reasoning is very different.
One is the past glories and greatness of history, while the other is past oppressions the desire to create a new history.
They can't exist together in harmony, and a regime can't go from one philosophy to the other. It's too big of an ideological divide to be bridged.
Cos the bloody Jew bankers did a bait and said and Jewed the Allies into fighting for the wrong side! lol poetry.
109 countries, an ocean and one moon.
Fuck me, no.
Stop reading Stormfront bullshit and puking it all over the internet like a retard.
If you want to talk history then learn history. If not, then don't and then you won't get baited by a bunch of retards into spewing their insane rhetoric.
Fuck's sake.
Shut up, nigger.