Ontario, Quebec, the Maritimes and NWT, the areas of the country that Lewis didn't win in the second round, have 68.6% of the seats between them.
If you can't perform east of Manitoba, how can you expect to win against Justin Trudeau? The East is more socially liberal than the West. So it shouldn't surprise you that the second-least socially conservative candidate won.
Erin O'Toole is basically a milquetoast compromise between the Red Tory and social conservative wings of the party. Erin O'Toole is a Red Tory Bay Street lawyer but he is the front-runner preference of 73% of the Leslyn Lewis/Derek Sloan wing of the party and so that was more than enough to boost him above the more liberal Peter Mackay.
I preferred Leslyn Lewis to Erin O'Toole. However as a small-l libertarian atheist in the 905, I can totally understand why Ontario preferred MacKay to Lewis in the second round. The 3 month abortion cut-off thing is going to turn social liberals in the 416 and 905 off. I personally feel that less people should be breeding, not more. I understand that religious Christians are going to be mortified over that opinion. But at least I'm being honest. Abortion is eugenic. It's mostly the poor who have abortions. And the poor don't have enough abortions. Why should you selfishly birth children into a life of poverty? I'm not saying the government should make it illegal for the poor to breed. But the poor should seriously re-consider having kids. I feel sorry for the Tyrones who are born into single mother poverty. They are dealt a shitty hand in life. The difference is the Liberals and NDP tell them it's because society is racist. When my point of view is that if your daddy is a deadbeat who walked out on you and your mommy is a crackhead or a ho, chances are your outcomes are not gonna be good in life.
If my parents were Tyrone the banger and Shaniqua the crackhead ho who works for Tyrone, sheeeiitt I'd want the doctor to choke me out with the umbilical cord. A lot of people are born into a life of misery.
So you think you get to decide which babies are born and which are not? You are evil
I did not say that. I am a small-l libertarian. People can choose to reproduce or not. However people who don't want to have a child should have the legal safe means to terminate their pregnancy. And people who have no business having kids should seriously consider abortion or at least not raw squirreling everything in sight or letting any deadbeat go all up in you raw. People are gonna go rawdog. It's inevitable. They're not always gonna do the responsible thing and wrap their tool. So I feel that it's important to have that last resort option (abortion).
I don't give a fuck about God shit. I am here because wokeness has become a religion and I find it easier to have discussions with conservatives than woke liberals who won't even tolerate any dissension. At least conservatives will have a discussion. I am more of an old-guard liberal so to speak. "Classic liberal" I guess though it does sound cringe I guess when people say "I'm a classic liberal".
Ontario, Quebec, the Maritimes and NWT, the areas of the country that Lewis didn't win in the second round, have 68.6% of the seats between them.
If you can't perform east of Manitoba, how can you expect to win against Justin Trudeau? The East is more socially liberal than the West. So it shouldn't surprise you that the second-least socially conservative candidate won.
Erin O'Toole is basically a milquetoast compromise between the Red Tory and social conservative wings of the party. Erin O'Toole is a Red Tory Bay Street lawyer but he is the front-runner preference of 73% of the Leslyn Lewis/Derek Sloan wing of the party and so that was more than enough to boost him above the more liberal Peter Mackay.
I preferred Leslyn Lewis to Erin O'Toole. However as a small-l libertarian atheist in the 905, I can totally understand why Ontario preferred MacKay to Lewis in the second round. The 3 month abortion cut-off thing is going to turn social liberals in the 416 and 905 off. I personally feel that less people should be breeding, not more. I understand that religious Christians are going to be mortified over that opinion. But at least I'm being honest. Abortion is eugenic. It's mostly the poor who have abortions. And the poor don't have enough abortions. Why should you selfishly birth children into a life of poverty? I'm not saying the government should make it illegal for the poor to breed. But the poor should seriously re-consider having kids. I feel sorry for the Tyrones who are born into single mother poverty. They are dealt a shitty hand in life. The difference is the Liberals and NDP tell them it's because society is racist. When my point of view is that if your daddy is a deadbeat who walked out on you and your mommy is a crackhead or a ho, chances are your outcomes are not gonna be good in life.
If my parents were Tyrone the banger and Shaniqua the crackhead ho who works for Tyrone, sheeeiitt I'd want the doctor to choke me out with the umbilical cord. A lot of people are born into a life of misery.
I did not say that. I am a small-l libertarian. People can choose to reproduce or not. However people who don't want to have a child should have the legal safe means to terminate their pregnancy. And people who have no business having kids should seriously consider abortion or at least not raw squirreling everything in sight or letting any deadbeat go all up in you raw. People are gonna go rawdog. It's inevitable. They're not always gonna do the responsible thing and wrap their tool. So I feel that it's important to have that last resort option (abortion).
I don't give a fuck about God shit. I am here because wokeness has become a religion and I find it easier to have discussions with conservatives than woke liberals who won't even tolerate any dissension. At least conservatives will have a discussion. I am more of an old-guard liberal so to speak. "Classic liberal" I guess though it does sound cringe I guess when people say "I'm a classic liberal".