NYT Feature: Defending PEDOPHILES
(media.omegacanada.win)
Comments (8)
sorted by:
Dear Michael Winerip,
If you check their charge sheet, you will find that most are guilty of offences relating to the grooming of a child for sexual purposes, sending pornography to minors, and endangering the welfare of a child. It should not need to be explained that the elements of those crimes (mens rea and actus reus) are satisfied provided the paedophile thought he was speaking to a child.
I hope this helps calm some of your obsessive paranoia against civilised, white society.
Just because it's illegal doesn't mean it's a crime. Homosexuality used to be criminalized; are you saying we need to send gays to prison? You fucking fascist nazi. Criminalization affects minorities the most. You're trash. Kill yourself and leave us peaceful progressives alone. Tell me who's your employer so I can call them.
Oh great. I'd like to order a cheese pizza.
White society? No racism please