NYT Feature: Defending PEDOPHILES
(media.omegacanada.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
Dear Michael Winerip,
If you check their charge sheet, you will find that most are guilty of offences relating to the grooming of a child for sexual purposes, sending pornography to minors, and endangering the welfare of a child. It should not need to be explained that the elements of those crimes (mens rea and actus reus) are satisfied provided the paedophile thought he was speaking to a child.
I hope this helps calm some of your obsessive paranoia against civilised, white society.
White society? No racism please