If you weren't taxed as much, you could keep more of your earned money, and maybe save up to have some capital.
Also, although rent is not taxed, land is taxed. So the landlord is probably charging renters for the tax he or she has to pay later.
Dealing with COVID is complex and difficult. There are no easy solutions.
This statement, and sentiments like it, make allowances for the governments contradictory, inexplicable, gaslighting behavior.
Battered wife syndrome.
I guess he is not ready to make a true stand yet. I guess no one is. At least not enough of us to be able to make a difference.
The reason I've heard is that the Federal government has to pay for it, if they do it themselves they lose future funding.
Some groups have taken it into their own hands. I think a group of reserves in Nova Scotia set up their own water supply system.
Olblacklegs explanation makes sense too.
If a vaccine works (ie protects against the disease), and the death rate is high, most people will take it voluntary.
It should still be optional though, on the basis of bodily autonomy.
If one chooses to risk that 15% chance of death, one should be allowed to do so.
They want to transition to a county with no property rights, ubi, vaccinations vs concentration camps, and a digital currency with a chip implant to track it (you).
If you want to be able to trade for goods outside of the chip, you'll have to figure on a currency others would want. Physical gold is a good bet. Not sure how property distribution will occur though, so not sure if owning farm land is a good move as the new "system" might confiscate it.
If you want to trade outside of the country, then it depends what country you want to trade with.
They are telling the PHUs to do more, to restrict more. They are adding sticks to the fire of "this pandemic is awful and we aren'tdoing enough." The writers have incorrectly not addressed the health costs of lockdowns and fear, but PHUs are apparently trying to balance that - at least my local one pays lip service to that idea.
This is prepping us for more local lockdowns and maybe "road closures" at boundaries.
Give no clicks, here's archive version. https://archive.is/YBass
I don't pretend to know Trumps plans. Here's a few thoughts:
- by fast-tracking vaccines he got ahead of the "planned" chipped ones
- being against vaccines would have given the opposition too much ammo
He supports voluntary vaccines- I don't believe he will mandate them, and most reasonable people would accept as the best position to take.
All Trump has to do is stay honest and force the globalists into a position where they have to admit to what they are doing.
Hidden admissions is not enough, even court cases is not enough. The media can ignore a lot. They need to be putting tons of people in prison, including so many media people the mainstream media is shut down or taken over, for this to break through to the normies.
The U.S. media is blatantly lieing now. What's to stop the Canadian media?
The better question is "what lie will they use to convince people to sign over their property rights?" Maybe they will just bury that info in the contract people sign.
Either:
-
lockdowns starting in mid-March were very effective at preventing flu spread (very unlikely)
-
individuals stopped seeking health care for flu in mid-march, and flu didn'tre-appear this fall yet (extremely unlikely)
-
COVID is actually a bad flu, and flu tests were changed to not detect it (requires conspiracy at high levels)
I'm puzzled because none of these are good explanations.
Not exactly true. If a single test result returns positive, there's a 50% chance it's a false positive.
It seems like my local health unit does multiple tests to confirm if a positive result is false or true, which is good.
I'm skeptical of PCR tests in general though. Even if you get a true positive, it could mean you used to have covid, or your body is doing a successful job controlling the virus - you might not even be contagious.
Helping people used to be community based. You helped you family, your neighbours, people in your church that you knew personally. You knew there was a real need, and figured out how to support them best. Maybe you fed them. Maybe you gave them clothes. Maybe you helped build a house for them.
Now, we rely on the government to help people. And the help isn't what the individuals actually need. Or it doesn't arrive. Or people who don't need help leech off the system.
And people stop caring, because "the government is using my money to fix it."
It's impossible to go back to the way things used to be. People say it's "unfair" to reduce or privatize things, but the current system is so bad it's unfair to everyone. There's many possible ways to improve things, but I have no hope of ever seeing it in Canada.
Fundamentally government (like any committee) is inefficient. Government also has an element of cronyism and corruption, including lobbyist bias.
Red tape problems: you can't live in a tiny home in most of Ontario, even if you wanted to. Why? Government thinks it's abusive.
Someone in my county built a cob house (clay&straw) and the government fined them 5,000$ for it (lack of permits or something was what they said).
There's tons of red tape in subdivision development and housing development. Most of it is good in principle but some of it is just excessive.
There's also tons of wasted money spent on things like asset management but that's mostly incompetence, laziness, and poor management.
This stuff is so disgusting i don't want to read the text. I've already broken my brain enough with the stuff I know and can imagine.
There is no punishment bad enough for these people.