Federal employees get the day off to mourn the Queen’s death. Not a holiday for anyone else. Redditors pissed. 100% complaining that they don’t get the day off. Not because they want to mourn, but because they don’t want to work.

Now i get why my perspective on life is at odds with the majority of leftist social media. They’re all employees. Their only goal in life is to get a day off to play video games.

What a miserable life… living life against their own self interests.

Quebec is fining people $1,000 to $6,000 for using fake covid vaccine documents.

This gets me thinking… i have two friends that got official covid vaccine documents from two different doctors, one for $5,000 and one for $10,000.

How many people would pay for official documentation if they knew that they could get fined for using fake documents.

On a side note, some doctors must have made a killing from covid.

Canada's biggest covid vaccine pusher believes that modeling is fact. This is the model that he presented to prove how many lives the covid vaccine saved:

Covid 19 vaccines prevented 14.4 million deaths..

Great study if you need something to confirm your own biases.

A scientific mind will question this study, though:

1. In our effort to provide impact estimates globally, we introduced various assumptions into our model.

Interesting that they're making assumptions in a study published on June 23, 2022. They could have used actual real stats, as we're 2.5 years into this thing and the stats are plentifully available. Perhaps modeling is a way to present the vaccines better than they actually are to further the agenda of the author's bias?

2. What kind of assumptions did the model make? Dozens, of which one particular one really stood out after a quick scan: we assume that all vaccinated individuals have a 50% reduction in infectiousness for breakthrough infections.

You're still pushing this in June, 2022, eh? When the assumptions are way off, the model will be way off.

3. Now why would an author of a study misrepresent the numbers? Maybe there is a financial incentive for him to do so?

When Canada's biggest vaccine pusher posted this as his proof about how good the vaccine is, I told him that this is the type of study that would be funded by a company like Pfizer. Now, after a further inspection, I was wrong; it was funded partially by GlaxoSmithKline - The author received personal consultancy fees from GSK. The author is also on the Scientific Advisory Board at Moderna. Hmmm? Conflict of interest much?

But, yes, believe the modeling, just like retards believed this one.

EDIT: Tuchodi is having a fit. My criticism of this model is really bothering him. So I'm gonna throw out one more criticism to make him go crazy:

Models are used mainly to predict future outcomes, as was the case with this guy's model, which happened to be way off. There's no need to model past events when you already have ample statistics to report. Be wary of anybody modeling past events when they can directly report statistics.

Consider this analogy - Economists often model future macro economies. They're not often right, but they provide some indication as to where the economy is heading. Let's say they want to compare the past to the future. They can directly report past GDP, past unemployment rate, past inflation, etc and then create a model to compare it to future economies.

Economists don't model the past because they have actual statistics. If they did, we would supsect that they had an agenda, as modeling the past is unnecessary.

I previously posted this. My math was wrong. Damn. I have to post an update.

I stated an incidence rate of 11.68 serious vaccine injuries per 100,000 people. That's actually per 100,000 doses. Canada's population is over 38 million people and they received over 87 million doses. That's an average of 2.67 doses per person. That means an incidence rate of 26.75 serious vaccine injuries per 100,000 people. I'd bet this is even higher due to underreporting of injuries and also due to latent injuries.

These stats look bad, but they're likely really much worse, considering that dying with covid is considered the same thing as dying due to covid when they calculate they death stats.

Thanks to Tuchodi for pointing out how many people the covid vaccine saved:

CDC's official stats says that there are 5.49 deaths per 100,000 unvaxxed vs. 0.92 deaths per 100,000 vaxxed as on May 22, 2022.

I compared this to Canada's vaccine injury stats: 10,168 serious adverse events in 87,040,246 doses. That's an incidence rate of 11.68 serious vaccine injuries per 100,000.

Here's another way to compare these stats: For every 4.57 people that the vaccine saves, it kills or ruins the quality of life of 11.68 people, and that doesn't include the milder injuries which are multiple times more.

Were the vaccines worth it?

Ontario's main Covid 19 page (and I don't mean the Science Table page because they've been reporting incorrect stats for a long time) seems to have stopped reporting Covid cases in ICU and deaths by vaccination status. Even Canada's main page seems to have stopped reporting.

Anybody know where we can get the official recent stats (again, not Science Table stats; official stats)?