This is meaningless without context…
-
How many other world leaders has Elon Musk had regular contact with in the last two years?
-
How many other business titans have been in contact with Putin in the last two years and who?
Without context, this is meaningless. The media wants you to be outraged. It’s working.
Sometimes we place bets on long-shots. I bet $100 on Joseph Woll to win the Vezina this year. Payout is $5,000. I don’t think he’ll win, but i made a longshot bet anyway.
Fyi - bet $100 on Vance to be the next president. Payout is $8,000. Trump wins nov 5, isn’t alive anymore come jan 6, vance becomes president and you get $8,000.
Bet on trump to be president, odds are really good, and the payoff is relatively small.
A poll is a guess at how it's going based on asking a tiny percentage of the voting public (anyway they hope they're voters) today, what they think will happen in the future.
What the fuck? No, none of this is true.
Congrats for making the stupidest statement of the day.
You can easily search this on a search engine, as i just did. It’s really easy.
The decision to retract was made due to two major issues.
Reliability of the data and choice of the data. The Belgian dataset in particular was found to be unreliable, based on estimates.
The assumption that all patients that entered the clinic were being treated the same pharmacologically was incorrect.
The above two issues meant that the Editor-in-Chief found the conclusions of the article to be unreliable and therefore the article needed to be retracted.
Haven’t you criticized others here for spewing conspiracy theories?