2
DoggyDawg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Be nice. This is the worst day of his life.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is meaningless without context…

  1. How many other world leaders has Elon Musk had regular contact with in the last two years?

  2. How many other business titans have been in contact with Putin in the last two years and who?

Without context, this is meaningless. The media wants you to be outraged. It’s working.

3
DoggyDawg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump is Hitler and a fascist. She sounds like the average reddit retard now.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Says the loser that has derogatory nicknames for all users on this site.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Apparently Tuchodi doesn’t believe that real people use one of the biggest social media sites on the planet.

2
DoggyDawg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like your fantasy that one of the biggest social media sites in the world is just bots?

2
DoggyDawg 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s up to 68 million views now. By contrast, your anonymous rant right here has about 4 views.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sometimes we place bets on long-shots. I bet $100 on Joseph Woll to win the Vezina this year. Payout is $5,000. I don’t think he’ll win, but i made a longshot bet anyway.

Fyi - bet $100 on Vance to be the next president. Payout is $8,000. Trump wins nov 5, isn’t alive anymore come jan 6, vance becomes president and you get $8,000.

Bet on trump to be president, odds are really good, and the payoff is relatively small.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

A poll is a guess at how it's going based on asking a tiny percentage of the voting public (anyway they hope they're voters) today, what they think will happen in the future.

What the fuck? No, none of this is true.

Congrats for making the stupidest statement of the day.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t care about any of this. I was just pointing out that you were wrong again.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can easily search this on a search engine, as i just did. It’s really easy.

retracted

The decision to retract was made due to two major issues.

Reliability of the data and choice of the data. The Belgian dataset in particular was found to be unreliable, based on estimates.

The assumption that all patients that entered the clinic were being treated the same pharmacologically was incorrect.

The above two issues meant that the Editor-in-Chief found the conclusions of the article to be unreliable and therefore the article needed to be retracted.

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

No you didn’t

1
DoggyDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can find this easily. Probably the best way to verify is to just go to the c-span x page:

https://x.com/cspan/status/1833698715841724887?s=46&t=e70nopYwt_DZjAiKIBoqbQ

view more: Next ›