Gotta get my kid a YouTube channel so they can pay their fair share
Trump: But it's a little bit like the police. So you have a rogue cop. You know what a rogue cop is? Very seldom. But you have bad people. You have people. No matter where, no matter what. In the church, you have some people that aren't so good, right? But you have a rogue cop or a bad apple or whatever. And what they do is they make it so that you catch so that it can't happen and therefore everyone else is allowed to commit crimes, murders like at levels that we've never seen before. No, we're going to have to do this immunity for the president. If you have a president that doesn't have immunity, he's never going to be free to do anything because the opposing party will always indict him as soon as he leaves the White House. And you can't let that happen. You can't. Then you can't let that happen. You can't you take away all of the power of the presidency. It'll be a different country
It's not a "question" it's a baseless claim.
Is that the narrative they're selling to you guys now? Peer reviewed scientific studies are cherry picked? They don't even include things that aren't peer reviewed so literally everything has been verified by a panel of experts. I've seen y'all claim absolute truth our of sketchier pre-prints without peer review and this is leaps and bounds above that in terms of validity.
You're a fucking clown. It's not cherry picking data, it's literally just all the data we have for the time period
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
How I make most of my decisions on what to believe - a legitimate study.
Abstract We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11 944 climate abstracts from 1991–2011 matching the topics 'global climate change' or 'global warming'. We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming. Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming. In a second phase of this study, we invited authors to rate their own papers. Compared to abstract ratings, a smaller percentage of self-rated papers expressed no position on AGW (35.5%). Among self-rated papers expressing a position on AGW, 97.2% endorsed the consensus. For both abstract ratings and authors' self-ratings, the percentage of endorsements among papers expressing a position on AGW marginally increased over time. Our analysis indicates that the number of papers rejecting the consensus on AGW is a vanishingly small proportion of the published research.
Sure. It's treatable nowadays.
So it's not science when 97 % of scientists agree that humans are causing climate change because... Sorry I'm failing to grasp the logic you didn't provide.
No bud I'm embarrassed for you.
I don't doubt that imaginary things you invented in your head sustain you. You just touted something 8 years old as the "latest polls" like a complete and total doofus.
You misspelled prison
Oh your article from 2016 makes a good point hmhmhm /s
Cope harder comrade, it's a real quote Google it.
Ignorance and bigotry is all you stand for.
Iowa hasn't picked a candidate that's won in 24 years with geeeorge duubuya. hijacking tho to spread some facts because someone said that leftists "censure data" in a dazzling display of projection (which is when your own guilt manifests in your perception of other people's behaviour. ie, you accuse someone of something you blatently do.)
Your side's "miracle cure" led to 17,000 preventable deaths.](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trump-drug-covid-deaths-hydroxychloroquine-b2474022.html)
Here's trump implicating himself with the most brain dead argument known to man
[whoismakingnews.com is a collection of data of sex crimes against children. 6444 offenders so far and 4 of them are trans. 0 are drag queens. Of the politicians included 75% are republican. It's also a 1:1,043,347 chance for a transgender person to commit a sexual assault - while 1:8,519 for politicians, 1:1,575 for ordained members of the clergy, 1:2703 for all religious offenders, 1:3221 for police officers, 1:8914 for teachers. ]https://www.whoismakingnews.com/#data) A child is 122.47 TIMES more likely to be sexually assaulted by a politician than by a transgender person.
-
A child is 662.53 TIMES more likely to be sexually assaulted by an ordained member of the clergy than by a transgender person.
-
A child 323.93 TIMES more likely to be sexually assaulted by a police officer than by a transgender person.
-
A child is 117.05 TIMES more likely to be sexually assaulted by a teacher or teacher's aide than by a transgender person.
That's rich coming from one of your many accounts that you use to manipulate votes and banish tuchodi and I from the hot page. Want some facts? Let's take a stroll down memory lane of the things you all downvote without reading. Your side's "miracle cure" led to 17,000 preventable deaths.
Here's trump implicating himself with the most brain dead argument known to man
whoismakingnews.com is a collection of data of sex crimes against children. 6444 offenders so far and 4 of them are trans. 0 are drag queens. Of the politicians included 75% are republican. It's also a 1:1,043,347 chance for a transgender person to commit a sexual assault - while 1:8,519 for politicians, 1:1,575 for ordained members of the clergy, 1:2703 for all religious offenders, 1:3221 for police officers, 1:8914 for teachers. ] (https://www.whoismakingnews.com/#data) A child is 122.47 TIMES more likely to be sexually assaulted by a politician than by a transgender person.
-
A child is 662.53 TIMES more likely to be sexually assaulted by an ordained member of the clergy than by a transgender person.
-
A child 323.93 TIMES more likely to be sexually assaulted by a police officer than by a transgender person.
-
A child is 117.05 TIMES more likely to be sexually assaulted by a teacher or teacher's aide than by a transgender person.
"Reee rreee it feels bad to me so must be Photoshop please God let it be Photoshop"
In his community he was known as a "redneck sociopath".
This obsession with trying to pin Eco terrorism on climate change activists doesn't make sense. Quebec dude was called a conspiracy theorist which pretty much defacto makes him alt right.
Old dudes are creepy. Exhibit A: https://imgur.com/1snKjU4 ["When Donald Trump was watching his 16-year-old daughter Ivanka host the 1997 Miss Teen USA pageant, he turned to the then-Miss Universe and asked: “Don’t you think my daughter’s hot? She’s hot, right?”
That anecdote, told to the New York Times by Brook Antoinette Mahealani Lee, appears to be the first recorded incident of the Republican presidential candidate and reality TV star making comments about his daughter’s body which those present have deemed inappropriate.
In the almost 20 years since, Mr Trump has called his eldest daughter “voluptuous”. He’s said it’s OK to describe her as “a piece of ass”, though she is a senior executive in his business empire. And he’s said that, if she wasn’t his daughter, “perhaps [he’d] be dating her”. ](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-ivanka-trump-creepiest-most-unsettling-comments-a-roundup-a7353876.html)
https://www.salon.com/2018/03/23/donald-trumps-creepy-comments-about-daughter-ivanka-a-history/
"There aren’t too many of them. I’ll tell you, I know you and I have discussed this over the years,” Trump replied. “The most beautiful women aren’t the major celebrities because you know you can name like, you know, somebody told me Charlize Theron.”
“To be honest, I think Ivanka is much better looking than her,” Trump said, after Stern told him he thought the actress was “hot.”
If biden is creepy for this, then you have to admit your pedo in chief is straight up sexualizing his own daughter even more than literal sexualized actors at the time.
Biden is a shadow of what Bernie could have been though, and I'm not super pleased he bypassed congress twice to arm the genocide in Palastine but this is very clearly a misdirection from the original daughter creep.
What difference does it mean indeed. Why would he lie?
Oh and one happy 17 year old my bad.
I had googled it prior but literally it would have taken you 2 seconds and doing it yourself probably would have been good for you. You spent more time being wrong and trolling when you could have been productive and grown as a person
You just admitted in a roundabout way that spending more money on cops is useless.
Irvin Waller wrote an entire book on smarter crime control where you can save 4-5$ with every 1$ you spend with diverting people away from courts.
Also being a delivery driver is a more dangerous job than being a cop. It's not even in the top 10 most dangerous jobs. That's a lie they sell to bootlickers so they can steal more tax dollars.
You're literally useless. Gonna take back your entire useless opinion now that you're officially wrong?
If you're incapable of googling shit for yourself then maybe don't spread your dumbass opinion
Rumpleshitsmell? You mean the guy who compared himself to a rogue cop and pedo priest and said they deserve immunity? https://www.meidastouch.com/news/trump-compares-himself-to-rogue-cop-pedophile
Trump: But it's a little bit like the police. So you have a rogue cop. You know what a rogue cop is? Very seldom. But you have bad people. You have people. No matter where, no matter what. In the church, you have some people that aren't so good, right? But you have a rogue cop or a bad apple or whatever. And what they do is they make it so that you catch so that it can't happen and therefore everyone else is allowed to commit crimes, murders like at levels that we've never seen before. No, we're going to have to do this immunity for the president. If you have a president that doesn't have immunity, he's never going to be free to do anything because the opposing party will always indict him as soon as he leaves the White House. And you can't let that happen. You can't. Then you can't let that happen. You can't you take away all of the power of the presidency. It'll be a different country.
Oh maybe you mean the guy who paid 200,000$ in taxes to China? And 750 to murica the next year?
https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/21/donald-trump-china-bank-account-nearly-200000-taxes-report
Oh wait silly me you mean the one who funnelled over 2 million from a dog rescue charity into his properties? Imagine how many dogs they could have reached if they didn't spend fucking 225,000 this very weekend because his daughter in law is on the board?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/big-dog-ranch-rescue-charity-linked-to-lara-trump-has-spent-nearly-dollar2-million-at-trump-properties
Yeah him being on the side of all the dicktasters and convincing them to hold off til he loses the election ( like on any of his and puuts secret calls they had during his reign, just in case you were uninformed about that too )and being nominated by far right politicians who also suck definitely proves he's a good person.