If I could, it would be all over the news.You're still going to have a hard time proving the vaccine is safe and effective. Also https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062939/
it's by design: the action of the spike protein is very drastic but difficult to prove for sure, and it also has many sites of action.The whole vaccine story has many places where things don't match, but proving anything (at the medical level, the rest is pretty obvious ) is really hard apparently.For instance one of the things that don't help is the way vaccine averse reactions are reported in many countries.And on top of those you need an autopsy, analysis etc. I use Occam's razor and in the story of the pandemy, there are so many things that don't fit satisfyingly that I don't feel safe taking it. Lots of corruption, the passes, the incredible authoritarianism, the uniformity of the response, the incredible preparedness for tech like the passes, but nothing in terms of medecine, in some place medical services being weridly reduced just before the pandemy, ihydroxychloro being banned in some country at the same moment, the fact that vaccinating during a pandemy is bad, conveniently forgotten along with many other medical facts that used to be common place. Then Trudeau telling us we're transphobic for not taking the vax. It stinks.
i dont think the vaccines correlate properly with sick data, and i certainly don't think any of the data we have convincingly proves either an interesting efficiency of the vaccines or that they are safe in any length of term. There's a very visible and nefarious intent to not use well known preventative medecine like ivermectin, some notoriously bad practices were maintained, then forced, and that doesn't trigger confidence. And that's on top of the rest.
they aren't , or more precisely you don't know why they're in ICU, and also there's the way ICUs are managed and the way they count the unvaccinated.For instance in many many cases, people are counted as unvaxed when they don't have all the doses, and then it get mixed up; that's why the 1 dose and 2 doses show weird uncorrelated results. Also you're going to have a hard time making anyone who knows mRNA decoctions to believe these make efficient vaccines, while many people working on mRNA have warned about their uncontrollable side effects.
the vaccine "reducing the severity" is the biggest joke in the universe.Not only does it make no sense on a classical vaccination level, it doesn't make any sense when talking abour mRNA vaccination that isn't one, and it also is an obvious tautology because you can't know what the gravity would have been.
1 vax is the people who stopped at one for some reason and the late shots, 2 shots are most people/ age groups, 3 shots is probably old people and the most at risk, and women. this graph makes sense according to a flu-like illness that kills mostly the elderly and within an unremarkable bracket. My theory is that vaccination is completely non correlated to ""covid" hospitalizations because these aren't really covid, and the vaxes only affect a " probability to get sick" across all illness types. So it is true that the vaxes get you sick, but this data is also useless.
Also. I don't have to. It's the vaccine pusher's duty to demonstrate that they are safe and effective. Safety has been measured dismal ( around 50 times less safe ) compared to classic vaccines, on all accounts. Research is a joke. Have you seen the Pfizer files? They're pathetic, and everything points towards the vaxes being extra toxic, and the tests being operated with zero quality when it's not obviously wrong. As of now only government propaganda has been repeating over and over in the msm that the vaxes are safe and effective, but these are just words, as proven by the complete lack of efficacity of the vaxes in terms of epidemiological control ; therefore all vax-passes are a joke. I am not waiting ( from you ) for links on medical research PROVING without question that the vaxes are safe for pregnant women. Peer reviewed. Thank you.