That’s the thing, we are all some minority group in one way or another. It could be skin color, religion, height, weight, mental illness, location, education, religion, almost anything. Yet a certain type of person likes to swoop in and claim that only THEY are oppressed and everyone who disagrees with them is a prejudiced oppressor. But the truth is, a lot of us don’t like to lead with the things that make us a minority. It’s the assholes assuming we are all perfect specimens of some identity group they made up in their head (or read in a textbook) who are being the real assholes.
The double standard is hilarious. Post a meme calling all Muslims “goatfuckers” and that’s A-OK, no hate, just an innocent joke. But quote the Talmud - an established, historical document - without comment, and it’s account banned. And I’m not even offended by the “goatfucker” jokes and I think Islam is incompatible with western civilization so I am no fan of Muslims. It’s just amazing how much people are willing to bend their own rules when the “hate” aligns with their views, and how close-minded and tyrannical they are when someone disagrees with them. It’s just like how “China Virus” is racist but “Spanish Flu” and “Indian Variant” are perfectly fine. I am not sure these people are self-aware enough to realize how inconsistent they are acting.
Literally everything these people disagree with is “racist” or “bigoted” or “homophobic” or “anti-Semitic”. The cuckservatives on the right have drank the Marxist Kool-Aid as much as the leftists have, they’re just a few years behind. Give it a few more weeks and they’ll be pushing this Birthing Person stuff too.
I think a smart thing would be to use something other than Trudeau for the upvote/downvote. It would be better to use something positive that inspires people, not just mockery of Trudeau. Mockery of Trudeau is fine, but using it as our upvote/downvote is too much like defining ourselves by what we oppose. It is more inspiring and stronger to define ourselves by what we support. Also, I believe that mockery of Trudeau doesn’t actually hurt Trudeau politically. What would really hurt him would be an actual candidate that inspired people. Then it would be “Trudeau who?”
Not every school is like that though. There are still some smaller, local, Christian schools that aren’t pushing total pedophilia and Marxism. But with these vaccines, even good people are brainwashed to trust them, so I could see non-pedophiles and non-Marxists tricking students into taking a shot and then going “oopsie daisy” when the parents complain.
Yeah I agree that they control the money supply so it’s not really about profits. But if you are trying to reach a normie, I think you have to reveal these things in stages. Normies are willing to accept that these corporations care about ratings and profits more than the health and well-being of the people.
I think if your kid is old enough, tell them that nobody is allowed to inject them with a needle unless you (the parent) know about it first. Even a teacher or even the principal cannot make you get any needles ever. It is up to the mom and dad and it’s only okay if they say it’s okay. If any other adult is telling you you have to get a needle, tell them, “My mom and dad said I can’t let anyone give me a needle unless they know first.” Then just leave the school and go home and tell your parents.
We should be vigilante here because these teachers might try to gaslight it through the kids without even asking the parents.
They really think they’re going to end the lockdowns. They still don’t realize we are in a communist takeover.
When the lockdowns don’t end, they are really going to be disappointed. Probably half of them will start to wake up.
But they are going to blame it on us and the media is going to jack them up into a frenzy.
We need to try to get them to our side when they first wake up. The media is going to want to pull them into rage and wrath. Try to rescue them from that madness. Explain to them what they are doing to us, how they are trying to tear us apart for ratings. Make it emotional for the liberal mind. Try to reach their feelings.
If we flip the normies here it could be a decisive victory against the corporate machine. Fire up the memes boys. Ladies get those heartstrings a-tuggin.
It’s amazing, their level of trust. They must know though that it’s an all or nothing thing. They might have some sense that if they flip that switch and stop trusting one part of it, the whole ruse collapses. They have probably seen friends abandon the TV and how once you seek for truth outside of it, a whole torrent of truths come at you. So to their eyes it might appear that by letting go of the TV we are being sucked into madness, so they are clinging on even tighter.
If people really wanted to dissuade others from Q, they would actually address the Q posts and proofs. But instead they just use the usual corporate media shame and straw man tactics. Problem is none of that works on the kind of people who gave Q a read in the first place. It would instead take an actual logical argument and a legitimate debunking of specific proofs. I think the reason this doesn’t happen is anyone who tries to do this eventually realizes Q isn’t what CNN makes it appear to be. Q actually asks very valuable questions and directs people towards valid research and information. A lot of times Q links to original sources, like actual declassified documents or government websites or military manuals. Like a typical Q post would link to a specific declassified document and say something like, “Read pages 67 through 72”, then he would link to an official CDC document with another important piece of information, then he would say, “Reconcile”. Then it was up to anons to do this research themselves and start sharing what they think Q is telling us. Do people see why just yelling “LARP” is so ineffective against that? It’s like, “Is the declassified document not real? Is the CDC document not real? Is the discussion this generated and the dots people are now connecting not real?”
I am not even saying people should believe one thing or another about Q. It’s a free country so believe what you want. But if want to know why all of the insults and censorship isn’t having the suppression effect you thought it would, that is why. Most people at this point don’t even care who Q is because the posts speak for themselves, just as text on a screen. It’s like telling a Shakespeare scholar that Shakespeare was a black dude, or gay, or a theater collective that wrote plays by committee. At a certain point it’s not that relevant because the plays are still the plays and they are appreciated for what they are: words assembled in order to make a point. All the mysteries and theories about who the real Shakespeare was are going to be secondary to that.
Actually I think the people using the blue medical ones are helping resist the normalization of this nonsense. The people who are wearing masks with a soccer ball because they love soccer are helping to establish this as a fashion trend that people are now attached to.
This article uses a photo of a mask littered on the ground. Could there be a way to counter the mask tyrants by buying up masks, crunching them up, running them through the gutter, then squirting them with some kind of yellow phlegm-looking substance, then just start littering then everywhere. They could be shoved in the aisles of stores, dropped on floors, tossed aside in bathrooms, left laying around on bookshelf’s, just fucking everywhere. Then employees would have to go clean them up, reaching between rows of fully-stocked Coke to pull out stiff, crinkly, dirty, and what-appears-to-be-snot-encrusted used masks. The employees would be revolted. The customers would think it was digusting. Everyone would start to hate the masks. They would be this constant digusting nuisance.
The masks tyrants want masks? OK - maybe the strategy is agree and amplify. People could just start to overload the system with as many disgusting masks as possible. Give them a tidal wave of masks. Masks stuck to their feet. Masks on their restaurant table. Masks on the toilet paper roll in the stall. Masks in the fruit bins at the grocery store. Eventually the mask tyrants might finally scream enough and ban masks.
One possibility is he’s setting himself up to oppose mandatory vaccination in a couple months. First establish that he is super pro vax and then when the globohomo mafia makes their move and demands mandatory vaccine, Trump comes out in opposition. If they try to call him a science denier or anti-vax, he has all these quotes about how great the vax is.
Sounds like they already have their 2022 Booster Vaccine and their 2023 Booster Vaccine ordered and ready for delivery.
So that lets you know their plan. They aren’t gonna let anything open up until at least 2024. But even then that is just carrot and the stick. They will promise to open up after Booster #3 in 2024, but what about Booster #4 and Booster #5?
The IMF has funded Cooties-19 lockdowns through to 2025, according to their published documents.
Probably their idea is to just lockdown the entire decade.
I think the argument there isn’t to try to sell these people on the value of work or freedom or anything abstract like that. Instead point out what happens under communism throughout history: after the “free money to do nothing” runs out (it only lasts about a month or two, once everyone is on it), your next check comes with an assigned job for the government. “To qualify for your next payment, we have signed you up to do this hard manual labor on these dates. Suddenly you are a slave of the state with no freedom and now you are working harder than you were before for no money, just your daily rations. The “free money to do nothing” was just the cheese to spring the mouse trap.
“They didn’t give me any. I asked. They said they weren’t doing that.”