4
tradebat 4 points ago +4 / -0

But spray paint 1 little marking on a mosque and it's a hate crime that leads to increased legislation to protect muslims.

2
tradebat 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the same as booing a transgender athlete and cheering when she loses. Which would be considered a hate crime by every single person who cheerted at Bubbas crash.

3
tradebat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Literally a hate crime.

This is akin to painting "the nazis will win" on a holocaust memorial.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
tradebat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Covering for her homicidal friend?

ACKTCHEWALLY SARA, One bad apple spoils the bunch, didn't you know? You have said so yourself.

Congratulations, you played yourself.

1
tradebat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just like the other metacanada, this is the internet. Be prepared for comments that disagree with you, call you names, etc. You just need to have thick skin and be able to use your brain.

This isn't a right vs left issue, this is an issue of people wanting to discuss normal things without being censored or policed by a biased team of moderators.

No one will ban you here, but you will get torn apart in the comments section. I take left stances from time to time, and I defend my reasoning for doing so vigorously. Sometimes people will comment with really good points and make me question my stances, sometimes people will leave rude thoughtless comments, and I'll ignore them.

Hope you hang around and keep an open mind, active discussion is what this place is about, even if a few people do allow themselves to post ugly things. You can't control everybody, that's just life.

2
tradebat 2 points ago +2 / -0

"The letter states that, as WE was approaching its 25th anniversary, many board members had been in place for more than five or 10 years. The letter says the organization decided to undertake a strategic review to focus on future priorities and to "address issues such as diversity, inclusion and range of competencies."

range of competencies."

"We're going to bring in some retards to be more inclusive" lmao

2
tradebat 2 points ago +2 / -0

One of the leaders of Toronto BLM is an admitted racial supremacist who believes that white people are genetically inferior.

Another one stole a quarter million from her student association because she felt racially discriminated against.

Who the FUCK would follow these people?

1
tradebat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gain an advantage and press it, you don't have to use lethal force. you just need to incapacitate them. It's really hard to fight when you have a broken joint somewhere in your arm, and there are plenty of joints to break.

Even just breaking fingers, which is ridiculously easy. How can someone fight if both of their pointer fingers are busted?

2
tradebat 2 points ago +2 / -0

I guess they prefer citizen militias and deputized oil workers.

3
tradebat 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm surprised media didn't censor the names involved to "protect the identities of the victims"

4
tradebat 4 points ago +4 / -0

Someone on my facebook, (actually 2 people) tried to tell me that Trudeau is centre-right.

I thought maybe they had mixed up authoritarian with right-wing, but then they claimed that JT isn't an authoritarian either. They were both insistent that Trudeau is centre-right.

They are both somewhat educated people who lean heavily left but claim to be centrists. This came up when I asked how JT could somehow still have the level of support that he does in the polls.

They say "that's because conservatives don't have and good candidates and canadians are too chicken shit to give jagmeet a chance." to which I replied "what would the ideal conservative candidate look like?"

To which they replied, "trudeau"

Of course closet leftists believe that the only good conservative is a liberal. I knew they would say that, I just wanted them to say without any coaxing.

view more: ‹ Prev