If I was running for office, my social media would consist of posting stuff like that. The strict defamation laws and hate speech laws in Canada would make it impossible for me to run for office sadly.
I think it's a smart play but question is do they plan to actually be tough on China once in power? CPC under Harper was pretty pro-China. Trudeau just happens to be more open about it, and accelerating the buyout of our country to China, but it definitely didn't start under him. Jury is still out on O'Toole, is he going to be a populist for us or an establishment hack that will say anything to get elected? Boris seemed populist in the UK until going full globalist. Doug Ford ran on being a populist but has completely bent the knee. Yes we want Trudeau out, I'm not suggesting not electing O'Toole, but we do have to be weary.
Yeah good point 2015 Stephen Harper really wasn't tough enough on 2020 China. Who knew Stephen Harper broke the space time continuum and existed in two different time-lines. Inter dimensional Harper was the best Harper.
The establishment's pick was MacKay because it was MacKay's 'turn'. The party bosses had groomed him for PM. O'Toole was just some random MP. If Dominion would have handed it to anyone, it would have been MacKay.
It was conservatives who were offended by MacKay's "sinking albatross" comment that cost him the leadership election, not CIA vote rigging (LOL).
Like assuming the Dominion backdoor is even real, do you honestly think they go around offering that service to any old customer around the world that wants to rig an election?
It would be pretty fucking hard to keep it a secret if they offered that service to every faceless, nobody politician on earth, right down to people running in backwater party leadership elections like Erin O'Toole.
Let's apply some basic critical thinking and common sense here. Not everything is a CIA lizard-people conspiracy.
I'll tell you what - you provide a shred of proof of your claims, and then I'll entertain them.
Until then you're just concocting fantasies in your own head, and then believing them like they're real, based on nothing at all. That's what crazy people do.
They're not wrong. Trudeau is extremely vulnerable on China.
If I was Erin O'Tool, I'd be posting this on twitter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwooCb_syhE
If I was running for office, my social media would consist of posting stuff like that. The strict defamation laws and hate speech laws in Canada would make it impossible for me to run for office sadly.
If O'Toole wanted support from Canadians, he should drop the China angle and talk about ending the COVID restrictions.
He won't though, because he doesn't want to stop the globalist takeover, he just wants to be the guy selling us out instead of Socks.
I think it's a smart play but question is do they plan to actually be tough on China once in power? CPC under Harper was pretty pro-China. Trudeau just happens to be more open about it, and accelerating the buyout of our country to China, but it definitely didn't start under him. Jury is still out on O'Toole, is he going to be a populist for us or an establishment hack that will say anything to get elected? Boris seemed populist in the UK until going full globalist. Doug Ford ran on being a populist but has completely bent the knee. Yes we want Trudeau out, I'm not suggesting not electing O'Toole, but we do have to be weary.
Yeah good point 2015 Stephen Harper really wasn't tough enough on 2020 China. Who knew Stephen Harper broke the space time continuum and existed in two different time-lines. Inter dimensional Harper was the best Harper.
Dominion picked o’toole.
He was chosen to lose so I’m guessing they focus tested this idea and no one liked it.
And you can prove this?
No, you can't because it's bullshit.
The establishment's pick was MacKay because it was MacKay's 'turn'. The party bosses had groomed him for PM. O'Toole was just some random MP. If Dominion would have handed it to anyone, it would have been MacKay.
It was conservatives who were offended by MacKay's "sinking albatross" comment that cost him the leadership election, not CIA vote rigging (LOL).
Like assuming the Dominion backdoor is even real, do you honestly think they go around offering that service to any old customer around the world that wants to rig an election? It would be pretty fucking hard to keep it a secret if they offered that service to every faceless, nobody politician on earth, right down to people running in backwater party leadership elections like Erin O'Toole.
Let's apply some basic critical thinking and common sense here. Not everything is a CIA lizard-people conspiracy.
Sounds like I hit a nerve.
I, and millions of others, will assume the leadership contest was rigged until it’s proven otherwise.
Why?
You assume dominion offers their services. I assume Trudeau and globalists picked his opponent. Not the conservatives.
Dominion picked O’Toole (and Scheer) to lose: that’s not a far out conspiracy. It’s a 50/50 chance.
I'll tell you what - you provide a shred of proof of your claims, and then I'll entertain them.
Until then you're just concocting fantasies in your own head, and then believing them like they're real, based on nothing at all. That's what crazy people do.
Where's your proof that the vote counts were altered?
That's right, it doesn't exist. You don't even have any statistical evidence to show that.
"deleted the ballots and used vulnerable machines" is not proof, it's just innuendo. From there you can only presume votes were stolen.
I didn't say they weren't vulnerable, I'm asking what proof you have that the vote was rigged.
Vulnerability isn't proof that abuse occurred. It's just proof that it was possible for abuse to have occurred.
What indication is there that the abuse did occur?