It wasn't thrown out, they just disregarded the request for (proper legal term escapes me) an emergency stoppage of election certification. It is still on the docket and will most likely get referenced from the Texas case.
largely owed to accepting the stronger case of Texas vs the swing states.
This is absolutely not true. The Supreme Court doesn't make decisions like that. The PA case just didn't have any merit, so it was thrown out as far as I see.
I rather look something up, then to accept the answer of a random on a forum that the SCOTUS already accepted the Texas case. They didn't even have a hearing yet on it. It can be thrown out like the PA case.
Didn't SCOTUS just throw out a case yesterday?
It wasn't thrown out, they just disregarded the request for (proper legal term escapes me) an emergency stoppage of election certification. It is still on the docket and will most likely get referenced from the Texas case.
This is absolutely not true. The Supreme Court doesn't make decisions like that. The PA case just didn't have any merit, so it was thrown out as far as I see.
Also, it didn't accept the Texas case yet.
I rather look something up, then to accept the answer of a random on a forum that the SCOTUS already accepted the Texas case. They didn't even have a hearing yet on it. It can be thrown out like the PA case.