So the fact that I didn't know the location of some total stranger at this very moment (why would I?) is proof that he's being detained by the authorities? Are you serious? This is how your mind works? This is your definition of "rational"?
I don't know where John Travolta is at this very moment either. Is that proof that he's under arrest too? Or is the reason I don't know where he is more likely to be that he's a total stranger who's location I don't keep track of?
Now, where is your evidence that Hunter is in police custody? Don't answer with another stupid evasive question. Show your proof.
I don't need any evidence of that. People not being under arrest is the default assumption. You're the one claiming he's been arrested. Therefore you're the one who has to substantiate your own claim.
So are you once again refusing to provide a shred of evidence to support your claims?
Yes. And it's a load of bullshit.
"Hunter has turned himself in"? He's not even wanted by the authorities. Where's your evidence that he's even been indicted?
Jesus christ learn how to recognize a larp when you see it.
So the fact that I didn't know the location of some total stranger at this very moment (why would I?) is proof that he's being detained by the authorities? Are you serious? This is how your mind works? This is your definition of "rational"?
I don't know where John Travolta is at this very moment either. Is that proof that he's under arrest too? Or is the reason I don't know where he is more likely to be that he's a total stranger who's location I don't keep track of?
Now, where is your evidence that Hunter is in police custody? Don't answer with another stupid evasive question. Show your proof.
I don't need any evidence of that. People not being under arrest is the default assumption. You're the one claiming he's been arrested. Therefore you're the one who has to substantiate your own claim.
So are you once again refusing to provide a shred of evidence to support your claims?
That's not a secret.