When they shut down all the small businesses and just left the big box stores open, they ended up concentrating all the shoppers together in a few big centralized locations, turning them into daily super-spreader events.
Now they're imposing curfews, as if that will somehow limit people's exposure to each other by keeping them at home more I guess?
Well here's the thing: Bars and restaurants are already closed. The only thing people are going out at night for is logistical activities like shopping - things they have to do every day regardless of curfews.
So all a curfew will accomplish is to shorten the available hours people have to carry out those logistical activities (like shopping), which will concentrate everyone into the stores during the remaining hours, which will increase social contact/exposure, not reduce it.
So like the small business shutdowns, this measure can only make things worse.
I don't believe for one second that there's any modeling that pointed to this being a good idea, because it defies logic on the face of it. At this point it's painfully obvious that governments are just taking drastic actions so they can be seen to be "doing something". And worse, there's no exit strategy. Nothing they're doing is working. None of these measures will bring an end to the pandemic (indeed they'll only make it worse), so where's the light at the end of the tunnel here? Is there one? Or is this the "new normal"?
Oh and they still don't know if the vaccines work on the new strains yet BTW.
So what are you going to do? Vote the Conservative Premiers out next election?
As for the lockdowns ... it's hard to say. They are countries which locked down hard with school closings, curfews and so on and they go the spread under control. The Czech Republic locked down and got the cases from 15k a day down to 5k a day. They opened up and two weeks later they are again at 15k cases a day. Now they are in their 3rd lockdown. The lockdowns in Poland and Austria also show that they kinda work. But then there are countries which are under lockdown which didn't get the numbers under control. Germany is now in their 3rd week of the lockdown and their new cases aren't going down. And Sweden, which didn't have any lockdowns, seems on a path that doesn't look good.
Seems like the Pfizer vaccine works on the new strain.
https://apnews.com/article/pfizer-study-vaccine-coronavirus-strain-3094dd3cc91b4a20780402476cdcb5ae
Another paper that just came out concluding stricter measures have no benefits: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13484
It was never about containing a virus, it was always about population control and leading us into communism.
If less restrictive interventions are the way, the Sweden would be in a good place right now. But the opposite is the case.
where did you read about sweden is not doing fine, a blog? Have you personally been to Sweden and seen the reality? what about Belarus?