Definitely. The only thing Canada has that resembles an identity is hockey culture, drinking beer, and telling people how we're different from Americans.
I know a lot of that goes towards native art. I have a few artist friends who have gotten those grants, and it’s almost necessary to make it about aboriginal culture in order to qualify.
So, it’s directly funding non-English/French culture. Otherwise it goes towards some other “progressive” identity.
We had our own culture. Since 1965 that culture has been systematically deconstructed. I think at first PET's goal was to heal the rift between English and French Canada, the thinking being that there won't be cultural conflict if there is no culture. It rapidly slid into the "Canada is a shopping mall" model.
Definitely. The only thing Canada has that resembles an identity is hockey culture, drinking beer, and telling people how we're different from Americans.
The removal of Don Cherry was the nail in the coffin for traditional hockey culture
Eh, sorry, eh.
I know a lot of that goes towards native art. I have a few artist friends who have gotten those grants, and it’s almost necessary to make it about aboriginal culture in order to qualify.
So, it’s directly funding non-English/French culture. Otherwise it goes towards some other “progressive” identity.
But wait.. there is a Cucknadian identity. It's called being a cuck. The essence of being Cucknadian is being a spayed, effeminate cuck.
Now if we'd just declare independence from the crown... and the CCP...
We had our own culture. Since 1965 that culture has been systematically deconstructed. I think at first PET's goal was to heal the rift between English and French Canada, the thinking being that there won't be cultural conflict if there is no culture. It rapidly slid into the "Canada is a shopping mall" model.