the real number we should be looking at is the absolute reduction rate which is less than 1%. Meaning we need to vaccinate over 100 people to reduce one case. Like the flu shot the vaccine barely does anything (other than disable & kill people). Theres a lengthy discussion here: link
The 95% efficacy number has nothing to do with its effectiveness of reducing symptoms neither does it mean it will reduce 95% of the cases. It's a completely relative number that has no real world meaning other than to fool people into thinking its super effective.
Before shot: the sniffles! I’m gonna die!!!!! Better go get tested and hide in the house
After shot: the sniffles! Must be spring allergies again.
After shot: the sniffles! That means it's working.
According to this data, the survival rate is already 98.1%.
If you're under the age of 70 it's even higher.
If the 'top docs' were honest about comorbidities it would be even higher.
But thank goodness for this vaccine... surely we were doomed without it.
He's lying since no vaccine is 99% effective and this experimental gene therapy is definitely nowhere near that.
Well, if a person dies from the injection, they cannot contract covid. Problem solved.
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/worlds-most-vaccinated-nation-sees-active-covid-cases-double-under-week
the real number we should be looking at is the absolute reduction rate which is less than 1%. Meaning we need to vaccinate over 100 people to reduce one case. Like the flu shot the vaccine barely does anything (other than disable & kill people). Theres a lengthy discussion here: link The 95% efficacy number has nothing to do with its effectiveness of reducing symptoms neither does it mean it will reduce 95% of the cases. It's a completely relative number that has no real world meaning other than to fool people into thinking its super effective.