To me, that makes it even more sad that is it legally considered mutiny to ask people to think for themselves and make the choice that's best for them.
Except that's not what he did. He encouraged soldiers to disobey lawful commands. You can't do that.
This isn't experiment without the subject's consent, it's the distribution of a not-very-well tested vaccine in an emergency pandemic situation. Nuremberg 1947 is not going to hold up in court for this guy.
The fact you think its a vaccine seems very Nuremberg worthy, cause I've never had a vaccine that doesn't prevent me from catching the disease, or spreading it to others.
You don't get to disobey orders just because you think they're illogical or unintelligent. And good luck convincing a judge that helping distribute vaccines is unethical.
Except that's not what he did. He encouraged soldiers to disobey lawful commands. You can't do that.
This isn't experiment without the subject's consent, it's the distribution of a not-very-well tested vaccine in an emergency pandemic situation. Nuremberg 1947 is not going to hold up in court for this guy.
The fact you think its a vaccine seems very Nuremberg worthy, cause I've never had a vaccine that doesn't prevent me from catching the disease, or spreading it to others.
The definition of an experiment you mean?
They're distributing it to the entire population for practical effect. That's the opposite of an experiment.
"Go help distribute those vaccines" is not an unlawful command.
"Go murder people with an untested, unapproved drug" is not a legal order.
Ok, so you're just crazy. Got it. I'll stop paying attention to you now.
It doesn't matter if it's unlawful in your imagination, it matters if it's unlawful in real life.
Now, which law were those soldiers breaking by helping distribute vaccines?
You don't get to disobey orders just because you think they're illogical or unintelligent. And good luck convincing a judge that helping distribute vaccines is unethical.