Agreed. It's hard (if not impossible) to find any criticism in the media about the mRNA gene therapy but there's plenty about the others.
If the media is for mRNA, I'm against it.
And it's not a coincidence that AstraZeneca/J&J are the cheapest and Pfizer/Moderna the most expensive.
It's not hard you just have to look pre-covid19. The animal trial results post-SARS COV1 in the early 2000s were not promising. The mechanism is valid as described but it is almost too effective. it completely short circuits the various homeostatic systems in your body. It's a testament to the hubris of these doctors that they ignored or blinded themselves to all of the major red flags.
It may be useful for actual gene therapy. But using it as a vehicle for a vaccine technology is completely out of scope and very reckless.
Of course. I'm by no means advocating for any of them. The best covid vaccine is none of them.
Just hypothetically if they've got me strapped to a table and tell me to choose the MRNA ones are at the bottom of the list.
Agreed. It's hard (if not impossible) to find any criticism in the media about the mRNA gene therapy but there's plenty about the others.
If the media is for mRNA, I'm against it.
And it's not a coincidence that AstraZeneca/J&J are the cheapest and Pfizer/Moderna the most expensive.
It's not hard you just have to look pre-covid19. The animal trial results post-SARS COV1 in the early 2000s were not promising. The mechanism is valid as described but it is almost too effective. it completely short circuits the various homeostatic systems in your body. It's a testament to the hubris of these doctors that they ignored or blinded themselves to all of the major red flags.
It may be useful for actual gene therapy. But using it as a vehicle for a vaccine technology is completely out of scope and very reckless.