This is interesting because the logic they use to excuse antifa from being deemed terrorists is that they're not an organization and don't answer to a centralized command structure.
Meanwhile, the police have said they've found no indication that Vindman was acting as part of a group or organization. But he's being charged as a terrorist.
Seems the definition of "terrorist" includes "must be part of an organization" when it suits the commies, but doesn't include that clause when it doesn't suit the commies.
This is why we need laws against communists holding elected office or judicial/law enforcement positions.
This is interesting because the logic they use to excuse antifa from being deemed terrorists is that they're not an organization and don't answer to a centralized command structure.
Meanwhile, the police have said they've found no indication that Vindman was acting as part of a group or organization. But he's being charged as a terrorist.
Seems the definition of "terrorist" includes "must be part of an organization" when it suits the commies, but doesn't include that clause when it doesn't suit the commies.
This is why we need laws against communists holding elected office or judicial/law enforcement positions.
I don't know. They tried to charge the guy who stabbed the CAF members with terrorism and failed.
And Bissonette wasn't charged at all.
Don't think it's a political thing. Maybe he said something dumb during the arrest or interrogation.
They asked him if he was proud to be a boy, and he responded "Yeah, sure I guess".