there is no "max amount of profits" in a free market/capitalist system.
??? Are you mentally challenged?
system and manipulating it to get more than your market share
Speak maximizing the amount of money you can make, speak more profit. Capitalism isn't immune to market manipulation.
Just look at their debt per capital compared to ours
Doesn't have anything to do with how much you spend on welfare or not. Look at European countries with mandatory 5 weeks of vacation, two years of paid maternity leave, living off unemployment for your whole life and rent subsidies for poor people. Far more than we get as welfare and yet they aren't as in debt as we are.
If there are no restrictions in place in a market, you really CAN'T manipulate it, without monopolistic powers (which only come about as a result of government action and barriers to entry)
If there was no immigration to Canada and we still had hedge funds buying up property, would that be the same?
Oh, and the PIIGS aren't in more debt than us?
Most of them do far better than us while having bigger welfare nets (in regards to debt).
Everything under your rules would be government manipulation.
Increasing immigration = government manipulation.
Decreasing immigration = government manipulation.
Less regulation = government manipulation.
More regulation = government manipulation.
ie make up for the reduced inflationary pressure
The success of Capitalism is based on slight inflation. There should be always some sort of inflationary pressure to keep the system stable. Risking prolonged deflation or high inflation leads always to a collapse.
However I feel a responsibility to NOT bankrupt my children and grandchildren's future just so we can live better today.
Welfare system aren't responsible for the bleak future of your grandchildren. If that was the case countries like Germany or Sweden would be deep in shit due to their out of proportion welfare states, but they are in good shape. In far better shape than Canada or even the US, financially speaking.
??? Are you mentally challenged?
Speak maximizing the amount of money you can make, speak more profit. Capitalism isn't immune to market manipulation.
Doesn't have anything to do with how much you spend on welfare or not. Look at European countries with mandatory 5 weeks of vacation, two years of paid maternity leave, living off unemployment for your whole life and rent subsidies for poor people. Far more than we get as welfare and yet they aren't as in debt as we are.
The consumer in Canada is demanding houses?
If there was no immigration to Canada and we still had hedge funds buying up property, would that be the same?
Most of them do far better than us while having bigger welfare nets (in regards to debt).
https://data.oecd.org/gga/general-government-debt.htm
Everything under your rules would be government manipulation.
Increasing immigration = government manipulation.
Decreasing immigration = government manipulation.
Less regulation = government manipulation.
More regulation = government manipulation.
The success of Capitalism is based on slight inflation. There should be always some sort of inflationary pressure to keep the system stable. Risking prolonged deflation or high inflation leads always to a collapse.
Welfare system aren't responsible for the bleak future of your grandchildren. If that was the case countries like Germany or Sweden would be deep in shit due to their out of proportion welfare states, but they are in good shape. In far better shape than Canada or even the US, financially speaking.