Actually, from what I have heard and read from various and reputable sources, the “usual“ dose is adequate, and it works best when administered early, especially when combined with other, tried, tested and true therapeutics. The larger doses mentioned were prescribed in “studies” conducted by the ”Vaccine” companies and other corrupt Public Health “Authorities” to discredit Ivermectin so they could push their “Vaccine” agenda. Look at all the incredible results from the counties in India that did NOT ban Ivermectin!
Furthermore, re: “In other words it hasn't yet been tested as thoroughly as the vaccines.”. !!!??? The “COVID Vaccines” have HARDLY BEEN TESTED AT ALL! They are NOT Vaccines, merely Emergency Use Only injections. Since EUA treatments depend on not having a cure or preventative, none of which applies to COVID, they are unnecessary and suspect. They are untested!!! Everyone getting the injection is a test subject, WITHOUT Informed Consent, thereby breaching the Nuremberg Code. THEY SKIPPED SEVERAL VERY, VERY, VERY IMPORTANT STEPS in the testing process!!! Human trials end in 2022/2023! Have you not read ANYTHING on them? What are you, a shill? Why the heck are they deleting and altering files on V.A.E.R.S., if the tests are as you say?
I recognize that it is a good idea to research information from other sources, but the comment you made above that I re-quoted and commented on makes me inclined to disregard anything you may suggest. It will probably be a waste of my time.
I watched that the other day. Mr. Sloan had three guest speakers.
Dr. Bridle is an academic whose specialty is cancer research. He is suggesting that the vaccines should not have been released without further testing. Some are mad at him for suggesting that. The question of how many more people would have died while the vaccine release was delayed didn't come up.
Dr. Phillips has been a doctor for 5 years and has a small family practise office in a little town in rural Canada. He not a heavyweight when it comes to discussing brand new global pandemics.
Dr. Welsh is another academic with no expertise in public health or infectious diseases. His "research focuses on the basis of vessel contractility and how ion channels and gap junctions (intercellular pores) control the electrical activity of smooth muscle/endothelial cells." (https://www.schulich.uwo.ca/physpharm/people/faculty/Bio%20Pages/welsh_don.html). He read a prepared statement for a little over three minutes, disagreeing with the government's response and calling for a Royal Commission into it.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Mine is that millions of health professionals around the world appear to be in rough agreement - not lockstep, for sure, but implementing similar measures - about how to respond to the pandemic. I reject the idea that they are all either in on a grand conspiracy or too stupid to know they are being used.
I would like to hear more about the places where different responses have been used, and what the outcomes were in those places.
All the reported adverse events from mild to serious: (358,378/2,600,000,000)*100 = 0.0138. So chances are 1 in about 7,250 that you might react to the vaccine.
All the deaths after getting the vaccine: (5,993/2,600,000,000)*100 = 0.00023. Chances of dying after getting the vaccine appear to be about 2.3 in a million.
Actually, from what I have heard and read from various and reputable sources, the “usual“ dose is adequate, and it works best when administered early, especially when combined with other, tried, tested and true therapeutics. The larger doses mentioned were prescribed in “studies” conducted by the ”Vaccine” companies and other corrupt Public Health “Authorities” to discredit Ivermectin so they could push their “Vaccine” agenda. Look at all the incredible results from the counties in India that did NOT ban Ivermectin!
Furthermore, re: “In other words it hasn't yet been tested as thoroughly as the vaccines.”. !!!??? The “COVID Vaccines” have HARDLY BEEN TESTED AT ALL! They are NOT Vaccines, merely Emergency Use Only injections. Since EUA treatments depend on not having a cure or preventative, none of which applies to COVID, they are unnecessary and suspect. They are untested!!! Everyone getting the injection is a test subject, WITHOUT Informed Consent, thereby breaching the Nuremberg Code. THEY SKIPPED SEVERAL VERY, VERY, VERY IMPORTANT STEPS in the testing process!!! Human trials end in 2022/2023! Have you not read ANYTHING on them? What are you, a shill? Why the heck are they deleting and altering files on V.A.E.R.S., if the tests are as you say?
I recognize that it is a good idea to research information from other sources, but the comment you made above that I re-quoted and commented on makes me inclined to disregard anything you may suggest. It will probably be a waste of my time.
Here is one podcast from good sources, to educate yourself. I strongly suggest you do some research and not tote Main Sheeple Media propaganda.
https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/bret-weinstein-darkhorse-podcast/id1471581521?i=1000525032595
Also watch Derek Sloan’s Parliamentary Presentation found on this site.
Bret Weinstein is not an infectious disease specialist. He argues from his political philosophy, not from his knowledge of the subject matter.
I watched that the other day. Mr. Sloan had three guest speakers.
Dr. Bridle is an academic whose specialty is cancer research. He is suggesting that the vaccines should not have been released without further testing. Some are mad at him for suggesting that. The question of how many more people would have died while the vaccine release was delayed didn't come up.
Dr. Phillips has been a doctor for 5 years and has a small family practise office in a little town in rural Canada. He not a heavyweight when it comes to discussing brand new global pandemics.
Dr. Welsh is another academic with no expertise in public health or infectious diseases. His "research focuses on the basis of vessel contractility and how ion channels and gap junctions (intercellular pores) control the electrical activity of smooth muscle/endothelial cells." (https://www.schulich.uwo.ca/physpharm/people/faculty/Bio%20Pages/welsh_don.html). He read a prepared statement for a little over three minutes, disagreeing with the government's response and calling for a Royal Commission into it.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Mine is that millions of health professionals around the world appear to be in rough agreement - not lockstep, for sure, but implementing similar measures - about how to respond to the pandemic. I reject the idea that they are all either in on a grand conspiracy or too stupid to know they are being used.
I would like to hear more about the places where different responses have been used, and what the outcomes were in those places.
There's what you have heard and there are the studies I referenced that say what you have heard is bunk. The last word isn't in yet.
More than 2.62 billion vaccine shots have been given so far. (https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/covid-vaccine-tracker-global-distribution/)
The following two sets of numbers are from http://vaersanalysis.byethost3.com/2021/06/18/vaers-summary-for-covid-19-vaccines-through-6-11-2021/
All the reported adverse events from mild to serious: (358,378/2,600,000,000)*100 = 0.0138. So chances are 1 in about 7,250 that you might react to the vaccine.
All the deaths after getting the vaccine: (5,993/2,600,000,000)*100 = 0.00023. Chances of dying after getting the vaccine appear to be about 2.3 in a million.
From https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ Chance of death from getting the virus: 2 in 100.
The math is pretty simple.