" In an interview with federal agents, Hopkins "revised his initial claims, eventually stating that he had not heard a conversation about ballots at all — rather he saw the Postmaster and Supervisor having a discussion and assumed it was about fraudulent ballot backdating," the report states."
No, my position is that the company who provides news websites with election results (speak Edison or AP) fucked up. These companies go around and ask the polling stations and elections of boards of thousands of counties in the US for millions of data points. If you tell me that this happens without any single error, then you might be retarded.
It would make no sense if there wouldn't be an error if people literally type in manually millions of data points. If there would have been zero errors, then you could speak of a manipulated election.
This one the article talks about was another interview of him later this year, where he waked it all back a second time. That he never heard something about ballots being backdated.
Hopkins "acknowledged that he had no evidence of any backdated presidential ballots and could not recall any specific words said by the postmaster or supervisor,"
Edison and AP provide APIs for news companies. These two companies collect individually election results. They have people phoning and/or going from polling station to polling station/election board to get the numbers. Then companies like CNN or Fox can just get it through an web interface.
Fake story because you don't want it to be true.
https://abc30.com/richard-hopkins-recant-recants-did-postal-worker/7866677/
And he's being also sued right now by the postmaster of Erie.
https://www.inquirer.com/politics/nation/usps-mail-ballot-fraud-erie-investigation-20210318.html
" In an interview with federal agents, Hopkins "revised his initial claims, eventually stating that he had not heard a conversation about ballots at all — rather he saw the Postmaster and Supervisor having a discussion and assumed it was about fraudulent ballot backdating," the report states."
Manually accumulating million of data points without error would be NOT normal.
No, my position is that the company who provides news websites with election results (speak Edison or AP) fucked up. These companies go around and ask the polling stations and elections of boards of thousands of counties in the US for millions of data points. If you tell me that this happens without any single error, then you might be retarded.
The person who typed in the numbers corrected it.
It would make no sense if there wouldn't be an error if people literally type in manually millions of data points. If there would have been zero errors, then you could speak of a manipulated election.
Then how did they switch votes? Did they sharpie over Trump's name with Biden?
Erie county doesn't use Dominion machines.
The old one in November? Yes.
This one the article talks about was another interview of him later this year, where he waked it all back a second time. That he never heard something about ballots being backdated.
Ever seen a guy making shit up?
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Edison and AP provide APIs for news companies. These two companies collect individually election results. They have people phoning and/or going from polling station to polling station/election board to get the numbers. Then companies like CNN or Fox can just get it through an web interface.
https://www.edisonresearch.com/election-polling/#two