CONTEXT:
https://omegacanada.win/p/12jJLGfjg1/ctv-bullshit-unvaccinated-people/
1.) You never addressed my comments related to PREP and HIV.
The treatment can create super strains directly as a result of the TREATMENT.
2.) Significantly more effort was afforded to using Africa as Guinea pigs for improperly introduced vaccine experimentation than providing clean drinking water and food.
Polio, a highly infectious disease that spreads through contaminated water or food.
Africans hate The gates foundation with a passion for exploiting them for medical research and having extensive Vaccine damages. There is extensive evidence in both Africa and India of the Gates Foundation acting in bad faith with devastating consequences.
2.) Discrepancies
A molecular clock analysis timed the emergence of the precursor to the Epsilon variant to May of 2020 in California.
Your initial reference was of epsilon appearing in July, your current reference is to epsilon appearing in May. I have scanned multiple different "studies" with dates all over the place. I even corrected your date of Oct for Alpha, It was September as that appears to be the consensus... on average.
The only evidence you've provided to back that statement up is for one variant, the Epsilon, and it appears to be incorrect.
NO, it is YOU who were found incorrect. See response #3.
Do you not find these multitudes of discrepancies of dates by official sources to be highly disturbing?
3.) Pfizer Data
Well, no. The list of variants we're discussing only had one entry from the US: the Epsilon variant. It appeared in May 2020.
Well YES.
PHASE 3 Pfizer Clinical Trials began in July. "Early" Stage Trials began BEFORE.
https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/05/05/health/pfizer-vaccine-coronavirus.amp.html
For Christ sake. HUMAN Trials were under way well before. "Early" Stage Trials began immediately in Moderna.
What I find most disturbing is your ability to ignore mass discrepancies and cherry picking of data from a select STAGE.
Let's stick to the topic at hand: the lack so far of evidence of a causal relationship between the variants and the vaccines. We can talk about the Gates Foundation in another thread.
YOU will not direct my conversation in the direction that is most convient to YOUR conclusions.
4.) Vaccine Hesitancy researcher.
> WHY are you here.
To see if claims that the MSM is lying to me are supportable. It's OK to have a wide variety of opinions on a subject because it makes for a healthy discussion, but at some point facts have to be produced. Otherwise - as somebody said - "That which is stated without evidence can be dismissed without evidence"
YOU have not questioned or acknowledged ANY issues related to the Covid Vaccines, in which they actually are gene therapies, NOT Vaccines.
YOU ignore facts.
YOU cherry pick data, by stage.
YOU dismiss FACTS as they inconvenience YOUR conclusions.
YOU are an easily discernable Agent of Misdirection.
FURTHERMORE
Is it lost on you that we live in the information age and NOT one News Network or Media Network covered the progression of Covid Vaccination Trials, from the beginning? I would have expected a live Documentary to be presented in this era of the Reality Show.
However, News and Media were lightning fast on presenting a pre-assigned narrative, from the beginning. Of which, they failed to present an accurate account of origin OR progression. Of which they, have flip flopped on a regular basis, in response to noticed anomalies.
Grey's Anatomy and several other "shows", that are created and aired by the same Networks that present our "News", left no time in presenting a pre-dispositioned narrative of events and conclusions, with NO factual data to represent those views clearly defined.
In many cases BOTH News and Media afforded an inaccurate set of criteria while at the same time stating "the science is ever changing" as an excuse.
This occurred while ZERO in depth coverage was offered of on the ground events at the same time, before and after, and continues to this day.
My toleration for incompetence and those who excuse it is gone.
ADDITIONALLY,
PLEASE view the Total Death rate of Canada over the last 20 years and that of 2020 and you will note NO SIGNIFICANT change to the TOTAL. Be sure to account for incremental increase due to the Boomer generation entering die off as that is the trend in play.
GO MANIPULATE somewhere else. YOU are a bad faith actor, here with a maligned purpose.
IN OTHER WORDS. FUCK OFF, YOU ARE A LIAR.
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/210607/dq210607a-eng.htm
"In the first months of the pandemic, from March to June 2020, 8,423 more lives were lost than expected."
"In the fall, the number of excess deaths and deaths attributable to COVID-19 started to rise again. From the end of September 2020 to the beginning of February 2021, there were 9,117, or 7.9%, more deaths than expected."
"After significant excess mortality had been observed since September 2020, the number of excess deaths in Canada started to decline through January and February. Almost 12 months after the start of the pandemic, from March 2020 to early March 2021, there were an estimated 18,511 excess deaths in Canada, or 6.7% more deaths than expected, after accounting for changes in the population, such as aging."
https://www.statista.com/statistics/443061/number-of-deaths-in-canada/
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/CAN/canada/death-rate
No significant TOTAL change. The stats you referenced appear to refer to changes in projected numbers.
They don't. Your links like the statista links are projected numbers. These are not official ones.
And we're not alone with a higher death rate than expected. In the US the number of deaths increased by over 16% between 2019 and 2020. From 2.8 million to over 3.3 million.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7014e1.htm
You are correct. The Statistica Data has not been Historically updated to today. I corrected in my recent post.
https://files.catbox.moe/7owgkc.jpg
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/CAN/canada/death-rate
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/CAN/canada/death-rate
No, it's not. You have to be blind to not see that on their website
NOTE: All 2020 and later data are UN projections and DO NOT include any impacts of the COVID-19 virus.
None of their 2020 numbers are real numbers. All projections from 2019 without any Covid impact.
You want to be a fuck. Let's play.
You ARE both referencing the projected AND the HISTORICAL data and mixing the fucking 2 separate sets of Data.
HISTORICAL DATA is NOT PROJECTED.
I acknowledged my mistake on Statistica.
YOU are the one who can calm the fuck down and actually LOOK at the HOSTORICAL data included.
You're not playing. You're losing.
Macrotrends states on their website that the 2020 numbers are not historical. Their 2020 numbers are UN projections before even Covid became a thing.
There IS A HISTORICAL SECTION.
https://files.catbox.moe/7owgkc.jpg
They don't even use the right timeframes. Their 2020 deaths go from July 2019 to June 2020. Half of the year is missing while half of 2019 is included.
Some countries like Canada fared better and some countries like the US did worse.
I deleted this reply with a correction related to statistica.
Please look at my reply related to macrotrends.
If Ham is a glowie, then you can bet the entire .win Network is too.
and that would make us totally fucked.
For now, I'll just continue hoping he is crazy, like most of us on here. ??
I have resolved myself either way.
Die with principles or a miracle presents itself, that saves us.
The very, very real potential that Hell on Earth will soon rise has already previously desensitized me.
Except for a Reign of Fire this time, isn't it?
Lol, he downvoted you, I didn't, for the record.