It’s a convenient refrain to dismiss out of hand the opinion of another as a “conspiracy theorist”.
For the record: the conspiracy theorist I was referring to is John Solomon, the man whose advertising agency published the article referenced in the original post. You can read about him online and make up your own mind:
The informed consent argument is interesting in an academic way. It's like standing outside a burning building discussing the merits of the various fire hoses instead of hooking them up. No doubt there will be some movement on the question at some point in the future but meanwhile there's a global pandemic going on.
And still on informed consent: medical credentials don't lend particular weight to your opinion on informed consent. It's more a question of philosophy.
Dr. Malone authored an important paper over 30 years ago. Last month "Malone clarified that he was not discouraging the use of the vaccine but was providing people with as much fair information as he could about their risks." (https://news.yahoo.com/single-most-qualified-mrna-expert-173600060.html)
Concerning those risks: 3.4 billion vaccine shots have been administered. Tens of millions of fatalities would have to be reported before the danger from the vaccine would be remotely comparable to the danger from the virus.
For the record: the conspiracy theorist I was referring to is John Solomon, the man whose advertising agency published the article referenced in the original post. You can read about him online and make up your own mind:
https://archives.cjr.org/feature/something_fishy.php
http://archives.cjr.org/politics/john_solomon_gives_us_less_tha.php
The informed consent argument is interesting in an academic way. It's like standing outside a burning building discussing the merits of the various fire hoses instead of hooking them up. No doubt there will be some movement on the question at some point in the future but meanwhile there's a global pandemic going on.
And still on informed consent: medical credentials don't lend particular weight to your opinion on informed consent. It's more a question of philosophy.
Dr. Malone authored an important paper over 30 years ago. Last month "Malone clarified that he was not discouraging the use of the vaccine but was providing people with as much fair information as he could about their risks." (https://news.yahoo.com/single-most-qualified-mrna-expert-173600060.html)
Concerning those risks: 3.4 billion vaccine shots have been administered. Tens of millions of fatalities would have to be reported before the danger from the vaccine would be remotely comparable to the danger from the virus.
That's not happening.