context of the MSM calling it "Russian disinformation".

They would have called it "Russian disinformation" either way, with or without censoring. Do you think CNN wouldn't have spin it the same way?

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/10/18/media/new-york-post-hunter-biden-reliable/index.html

"The NY Post sources aren't reliable, these are just rumours of rumours, they cooperated with Russian agents" ... the same points would have been made if Twitter didn't censor this story. Also Fox News is part of the MSM and they reported extensively on it.

If you really want to persuade people that the election was indeed rigged, then provide hard evidence. And not some "Dominion switched votes" theories which fall apart after a hand count or some retards in Arizona who scan every ballot under UV light for bamboo fibres. Because currently we have all this Qanon bullshit noise out there about raided servers in Germany and the involvement of the Italian government. There should be thousands and thousands of people involved in such a grand scheme to steal the election, and yet not a single one can be found.