This statement is objectively. The odds are greater than zero. Human history is filled with mistakes like this - lead in gaz, ozone layer destruction, asbestos insulation. You can hide your head and the sand like the majority of people and ignore the risks, and that's perfectly fine. Especially if you're a fat diabetic with asthma, or if you're old and at risk. But the vaccine uses a new, unvisited technology, and brings along its risks of failure.
Vaccines aren't new technology, and clinical trials exist to weed out potential problems. If millions of people are taking them and are fine then it's probably fine.
You're saying that and assuming it's a certainty when it's simply not.
This statement is objectively. The odds are greater than zero. Human history is filled with mistakes like this - lead in gaz, ozone layer destruction, asbestos insulation. You can hide your head and the sand like the majority of people and ignore the risks, and that's perfectly fine. Especially if you're a fat diabetic with asthma, or if you're old and at risk. But the vaccine uses a new, unvisited technology, and brings along its risks of failure.
Vaccines aren't new technology, and clinical trials exist to weed out potential problems. If millions of people are taking them and are fine then it's probably fine.