I would say that 20% is significant. But without knowing how many of the "unvaccinated" actually got a shot and when the numbers actually don't really "speak for themselves". There's really nothing more to discuss, though, since your initial assertion has been shown to be incorrect.
You can quibble over details all you want but those numbers clearly show that on average two thirds of the daily new cases and three quarters of the people in hospitals aren't protected by vaccines. Way less than half of the population - the unvaccinateded and the not-fully-vaccinated - is providing way more than half of the patients.
Using the fact that it takes a some time for the vaccines to work properly is your way of closing your eyes and putting your hands over your ears.
I would say that 20% is significant. But without knowing how many of the "unvaccinated" actually got a shot and when the numbers actually don't really "speak for themselves". There's really nothing more to discuss, though, since your initial assertion has been shown to be incorrect.
You can quibble over details all you want but those numbers clearly show that on average two thirds of the daily new cases and three quarters of the people in hospitals aren't protected by vaccines. Way less than half of the population - the unvaccinateded and the not-fully-vaccinated - is providing way more than half of the patients.
Using the fact that it takes a some time for the vaccines to work properly is your way of closing your eyes and putting your hands over your ears.