I don't have to "prove" a negative. That's not how it works. If someone's going to claim there was a CPC sign at some undisclosed address, the burden of proof is on him.
Without knowing the address and having surveillance footage of the relevant area for the relevant time, his claim is unfalsifiable and therefore worthless.
It's like me saying you flashed your pecker at me, offering no proof, and not even saying where or when it happened. In that scenario, you can't even prove you were somewhere else at the time because no time or place has been provided in the accusation. The accusation in that case is worthless without proof.
That's right, a CPC smear on CBC is hardly shocking.
Also wouldn't surprise me if the founder of Ekos, who has been donating to the Liberals since 2003, is pushing Bernier numbers up so NDP voters get scared and switch their votes to the Liberals.
CBC are liars but I'd be surprised if Ekos is deliberately fudging numbers.
These polling companies make their money mainly from market research. That's where their bread is buttered. This election polling stuff is like a showroom event for them. It's where they get to demonstrate how much more accurate their polls are compared to their competitor's polls. They're all trying to be more accurate than the other guy because the more accurate you are, the more attractive you are to market research clients.
They're not going to sell their reputations out to give Trudeau a nudge in an election campaign. And if they ever got caught deliberately faking their numbers, they'd be fucking toast. And all it would take is one whistleblower from within the company to blow the lid off of the whole thing and bring the company down.
The cost to their reputations of being inaccurate (i.e. incompetent in the eyes of prospective market research clients who are their bread and butter), and the risk of them getting caught are just way too high for them to fuck around.
I don't have to "prove" a negative. That's not how it works. If someone's going to claim there was a CPC sign at some undisclosed address, the burden of proof is on him.
Without knowing the address and having surveillance footage of the relevant area for the relevant time, his claim is unfalsifiable and therefore worthless.
It's like me saying you flashed your pecker at me, offering no proof, and not even saying where or when it happened. In that scenario, you can't even prove you were somewhere else at the time because no time or place has been provided in the accusation. The accusation in that case is worthless without proof.
That's right, a CPC smear on CBC is hardly shocking.
Also wouldn't surprise me if the founder of Ekos, who has been donating to the Liberals since 2003, is pushing Bernier numbers up so NDP voters get scared and switch their votes to the Liberals.
CBC are liars but I'd be surprised if Ekos is deliberately fudging numbers.
These polling companies make their money mainly from market research. That's where their bread is buttered. This election polling stuff is like a showroom event for them. It's where they get to demonstrate how much more accurate their polls are compared to their competitor's polls. They're all trying to be more accurate than the other guy because the more accurate you are, the more attractive you are to market research clients.
They're not going to sell their reputations out to give Trudeau a nudge in an election campaign. And if they ever got caught deliberately faking their numbers, they'd be fucking toast. And all it would take is one whistleblower from within the company to blow the lid off of the whole thing and bring the company down.
The cost to their reputations of being inaccurate (i.e. incompetent in the eyes of prospective market research clients who are their bread and butter), and the risk of them getting caught are just way too high for them to fuck around.
Why didn't the CBC says the rock throwers were Conservative then? if its all about swaying public opinion to their closest competition.
Not an argument.
LOL when you've calmed down, come back and re-read this thread then tell me who's the one "spazzing out".