Segregation: 1921 vs 2021
(media.omegacanada.win)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Shit like this is why people don't take the anti-vax crowd seriously and dismiss you all as nuts.
Some people have trouble grasping the concept of public health. It's ironic that they do the most damage to each other.
whats going to be ironic is when you retards keep giving covid back and forth to each other and then wonder why this happened, "I got vaccinated didn't I?".
Then the government is going to mandate a booster every 6 months and daily pills, and like a good little sheep you will do it, all for a sub 1% chance you could die if by chance you happen to even contract the damn virus
*<1% death rate includes old people and fatties
Congratulations! You have found a clever way of telling us you don't know how vaccines work.....
and you don't know how many people have tested positive for the virus
and you prefer the worthless gross mortality rate to the case fatality rate
and you don't know about the other vulnerable people, and don't give a shit for any of them or the people who care about them.
But there's no law against being ignorant, so carry on.
https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2021/new-data-on-covid-19-transmission-by-vaccinated-individuals
not worth
What is wrong with you???!!!! From your own link:
"though in the vaccinated, these levels rapidly diminish. There is also some question about how cultivatable—or viable—this virus retrieved from vaccinated people actually is."
and
"While this sounds discouraging, it’s important to keep three things in mind:
What is wrong with you.
You are taking a temporary immune booster that has the potential for a lethal side effect when their are perfectly effective and safe alternatives you could be taking instead.
Even if the vaccine worked as advertised and provided actual immunity, I probably still wouldn't take it.
According to who? For every accepted study so far - not a pre-print but an actual peer-reviewed large-scale double-blind study performed by accredited professionals in the field - that indicates there's another treatment that should be explored there are dozens that find that avenue provides so little benefit as to be a waste of resources.
No one knowledgeable about vaccines ever, anywhere, said the vaccines provided immunity. From the very beginning, when the large scale trials concluded, the best rating any vaccine got was 95% effective. And they went on to clarify that by that they meant the severity of the illness caused by the virus was reduced, easing the burden on the healthcare system.
What was it in the link you provided that you thought supported your argument? Because (again) here's what I read in it:
==========
"though in the vaccinated, these [viral] levels rapidly diminish. There is also some question about how cultivatable—or viable—this virus retrieved from vaccinated people actually is."
and
"it’s important to keep three things in mind:
==========
How can you take that and say "See? This says you shouldn't get vaccinated."?
"According to who?"
India
"the best rating any vaccine got was 95% effective"
Well, I wish that vaccine was at least effective enough that people would not insist I get vaccinated or I am literally killing them. I wish it was at least effective enough that it does not wear off after 6-8 months. I wish the vaccine wasn't so leaky as to get variants within 4 months
My personal effectiveness score, 15%
Vaccinated people spread the virus less https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02187-1
Unvaccinated people stand a better chance of getting it from an infected unvaccinated person because they spread the virus longer.