https://ivmmeta.com/

This site is 100% anonymous. It claims to be maintained by "PhD researchers, scientists, people who hope to make a contribution" (https://ivmmeta.com/faq.html) but there appears to be no way to verify that.

At the same time there are complaints about ivmmeta's methodology from people who seem to know what they're talking about and who are not anonymous: https://ebm.bmj.com/content/early/2021/05/26/bmjebm-2021-111678, https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-critical-thinking/ivermectin-convalescent-plasma-and-hydroxychloroquine-one-year-rotten-apples, https://opmed.doximity.com/articles/will-ivermectin-cure-covid-19?_csrf_attempted=yes

https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbes-personal-shopper/2021/09/27/best-smart-door-locks/?h=3d2c01835331

"The 8 Best Smart Door Locks That Make Traditional Keys Obsolete"

Huh?

https://www.thedesertreview.com/news/national/ivermectin-obliterates-97-percent-of-delhi-cases/article_6a3be6b2-c31f-11eb-836d-2722d2325a08.html

I asked for studies, not opinions in a minor publication with a crappy reputation (https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-desert-review-bias/). That said, the article contains a link to a paper from 13 months ago that talks about how to keep people from plugging up healthcare facilities. It recommends mask-wearing, hand-washing, social distancing, etc. plus a bunch of already existing drugs that they think might help keep people out of the hospital, but it's all very tentative because, well, it's from 13 months ago. And it makes no mention of ivermectin.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTtu_Xho_gI&t=42s

Not a particularly sterling character, eh? Proponent of the discredited Marik Protocol, unable to get his ivermectin study published in a proper journal due to “a series of strong, unsupported claims based on studies with insufficient statistical significance, and at times, without the use of control groups.” (https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/frontiers-removes-controversial-ivermectin-paper-pre-publication-68505) So he gets his questionable views out on Youtube, which - as we all know - publishes just about anything.

https://ivmmeta.com/

That one shows promise. I looked at it some months ago and stopped after finding a study that found no improvement and another that claimed to be peer reviewed but wasn't. But it's time to look at it again. I see it now has a lot of randomized controlled trials listed. Thank you.

are you going to REEEEEEE

What?

you don't actually believe the vaccines are highly effective

They are only "highly effective" in the people who get them. The people who don't , well, they spread the virus.