How is this "jab" supposed to "slow" or "prevent" other people from getting Covid-19 from you?
I generally understand that it may help reduce symptoms, but have no idea what else these injections will do to "slow" or "prevent" an jabbed individual from infecting another?
Assuming the jab you got is for the strain going around - does it prevent you from spreading it?
People are saying it does prevent the spread.
What exactly are they basing this on?
How plausible or probable is their explanation?
I want to understand this better from both sides - even if you disagree with the other side. I haven't been able to articulate this yet, and hearing a concise take on this would be useful.
I'm guessing this is all they have - if so - how strong is this argument is. Is there any compelling evidence in this particular study? I keep hearing that a vaxed person can still infect another - but if this is correct below, then it would be less likely - or maybe it's not related at all.. Thoughts?:
"Other study findings suggest that fully or partially vaccinated people who got COVID-19 might be less likely to spread the virus to others. For example, fully or partially vaccinated study participants had 40 percent less detectable virus in their nose (i.e., a lower viral load), and the virus was detected for six fewer days (i.e., viral shedding) compared to those who were unvaccinated when infected. In addition, people who were partially or fully vaccinated were 66 percent less likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection for more than one week compared to those who were unvaccinated. While these indicators are not a direct measure of a person’s ability to spread the virus, they have been correlated with reduced spread of other viruses, such as varicella and influenza." https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/p0607-mrna-reduce-risks.html
Theres one: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3897733 (MSM thinks they deboonked it, but they didn't)
And there was another, but I can't find it. IIRC:
The more probable explanation however is the vax is causing ADE and the vaxxed's leukocytes are disabled.
Here's research that says viral loads falls significantly faster in vaxxed people.
But I mean there is so many more studies that show the same direction: here, here, here
But you know what doesn't stop a pandemic - doing nothing. And by nothing I mean putting faith in ineffective treatments, attending anti-vaxx / lockdown rallies, etc. These actions are pro-pandemic.
You want to "stop a pandemic"? Turn off the news. No one is dying from covid. It's BS. BC residents are more likely to die from drug overdoses. Alberta/Manitobans are more likely to die from suicide/alcohol. Ontarians are more likely to die from murder.
REEEEEEEEEE
So salty!
It's not deboonked because while it's not what they were looking at, when they tested the original variant the staff were not vaxxed, when they tested for delta they were. 251 fold increase is not consistent with other studies of Delta. Ergo vaxxed = more virus.
The first study you linked in the other direction: PCR CT were "similar" on both groups; not the same; ergo diagnosis bullshit games.
Second link shows no difference in viral load 1-11 days then insignificant difference afterwards: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01316-7/figures/2 a one day CT difference is statistical noise.
Don't just accept the abstract, actually read it.
The third study concludes more virus = more sick. It isn't about vax.
The last one you linked "Studies that involved active follow-up of contacts and that used serologic testing have shown higher rates of household transmission than were observed in our study" in other words "when you don't rely just on PCR testing BS and actually diagnose covid, it shows higher transmission."