Why wouldn’t I be asking a question? Are questions not permitted? Look it up? Alright. Let’s do that. I believe it will be more positive news than the dinosaur media likes to terrorize the public into believing.
If anything, it’s a rhetorical question because we already can have an educated guess at the likely answer based on previous statistical/health data over Rona “cases” and very sick people. That is, the patients are likely older and or/also have underlying health issues.
Let’s see the prior happenings so far with the Rona, deaths “from” (or “with”) the Rona for Eg.
In BC - 96.6% of all Rona related deaths (as of July ish) are in long term care homes. 96.6% sounds a heck of a lot like 100% if one assumes (quite reasonably) rounding errors. Even the other way around +- 3%, that’s still 94%. Long term care homes tends to house the elderly and frail.
That’s no bitchute video, that’s from BC health itself.
Sure it’s from July, however that’s around a whole year of the Rona panic. A years data at the “height” or the “pandemic” should be enough to give one a pattern.
Moreover, poring over the data on BC health’s sure one can see the vast majority of those admitted to the hospital over BC as a province were elderly as of about july. Has much changed since? Maybe. Why would it?
If the pathogen has switched from finishing off the elderly and frail to younger folk that would mean it’s mutating into a more pathogenic form. That would be unusual seeing as that flies in the face of virii self sustaining evolution. Virii mutations mean weaker ones, not stronger. A virus will not exist if it kills its hosts too quickly. Sars-cov-2s other Corona cousins flu a and flu b, also kill only the frail elderly and very sick.
Meanwhile over in England, a FOIA request to their NHS royal Cornwall hospitals (pop 568K) asked the following Qs
a. What’s the total deaths from Corona ONLY from mar 20 to jan 21?
b. Total # of deaths who have died with Corona AND also had additional health issues?
c. What is the number of cycles used in the NHS for the covid PCR tests to determine a diagnosis?
Answers
A. 11 patients died from only covid.
b. 135 patients died with covid had underlying health conditions.
C. At least 38 cycles.
Source: UK FOIA Request ref 12505 Jenna Dunstan information governance team.
11 patients died from Rona only. Out of a pop of 568k that’s 0.0019%. Being charitable, let’s say 135 and 11 deaths aren’t part of the same dataset and are additive. 146 people. 146 people died either with or from the Rona in that part of England March 20-Jan 21, again, supposedly including the ‘deadly’ winter period.
0.025% or the other way around, a survival rate of 99.6% rounded up pessimistically. Sounds a heck of a lot like official CDC and English ONS IFR (infection fatality ratio) numbers of 0.005% & 0.003% respectively. Let’s go all dinosaur fake news fear porn media with the ‘grim milestone’ with the worst case scenario 0.054%, a 94.6% survival rate. That’s for 70+ years. (Source: CDC Scenario 5)
Back to the original Q about ages, health conditions of patients admitted into Canadian hospitals with the “Rona”:
I’m going to look into that. And the data will show either:
There is no information avail (or kept) over ages and existing diseases /conditions of patients admitted - which will be odd. As what changed? Why so coy now when data was available before?
The data will show a similar pattern. That is, the elderly and or frail with cormobidities.
The pathogen over the course of a few months suddenly mutate, and infect and hospitalize (allegedly un poked) folk over a random age cohort. Strange, considering that mutating Corona virii get weaker not stronger.
Ah, the fabled Indian/delta variant. A mutation the health Poohbahs in BC/ON for Eg, are so sure to be befalling people. Which raises 2 questions:
How do they know it’s a slightly different cov 2, when the much ballyhooed PCR test cannot tell the difference between a cov2 original version or the Indian version let alone influenza?
Does the fact that in BC, Herr Gesundheitfuhrer Bonnie Henry decreed that persons refusing a test on admittance would be assumed to have the coof? Or some similar pronouncement - going off memory. The end result was assumed “cases” at any rate to a degree.
Can the health cheeses like Adrian Dix et al, really say with a straight face that it’s the unjabbed, knowing likely that at least 1 person has been admitted within days of taking a shot or 2? Because of the capricious sophistry of only counting people as jabbed after a full 14 days? And that if I’m hospital for more than 14 days, on discharge still only counting jab “status” from the original date of admittance?
Oh but the holy lanced are only fully protected after 14 days! Okay, so no possibility of adverse reactions causing the hospitalizations? Perhaps the powers that be should be making sure of that eh? First do no harm and all that. What would the harm be?
It’s not like Pfizer /Moderna make billions out of this and exiting treatments like HCQ, Regeneron and an inhaled corticosteroid bidesimide that cost pennies or a few bucks might have anything to do with it.
Anyway. I digress. I’ll endeavour to look that info up about patient ages and current diseases and get back to this forum. Meanwhile, you are free to do the same.
After all, for a disease so ‘deadly’ and ‘terrifying’ one would imagine you want to find out yourself right?
However, if you got the double double, you have nothing to worry about. All is well.
If that was an honest question you wouldn't be asking someone you don't know on the Internet. You'd be looking it up yourself.
Why wouldn’t I be asking a question? Are questions not permitted? Look it up? Alright. Let’s do that. I believe it will be more positive news than the dinosaur media likes to terrorize the public into believing.
If anything, it’s a rhetorical question because we already can have an educated guess at the likely answer based on previous statistical/health data over Rona “cases” and very sick people. That is, the patients are likely older and or/also have underlying health issues.
Let’s see the prior happenings so far with the Rona, deaths “from” (or “with”) the Rona for Eg.
Sure it’s from July, however that’s around a whole year of the Rona panic. A years data at the “height” or the “pandemic” should be enough to give one a pattern.
Moreover, poring over the data on BC health’s sure one can see the vast majority of those admitted to the hospital over BC as a province were elderly as of about july. Has much changed since? Maybe. Why would it?
If the pathogen has switched from finishing off the elderly and frail to younger folk that would mean it’s mutating into a more pathogenic form. That would be unusual seeing as that flies in the face of virii self sustaining evolution. Virii mutations mean weaker ones, not stronger. A virus will not exist if it kills its hosts too quickly. Sars-cov-2s other Corona cousins flu a and flu b, also kill only the frail elderly and very sick.
a. What’s the total deaths from Corona ONLY from mar 20 to jan 21? b. Total # of deaths who have died with Corona AND also had additional health issues? c. What is the number of cycles used in the NHS for the covid PCR tests to determine a diagnosis?
Answers A. 11 patients died from only covid. b. 135 patients died with covid had underlying health conditions. C. At least 38 cycles. Source: UK FOIA Request ref 12505 Jenna Dunstan information governance team.
11 patients died from Rona only. Out of a pop of 568k that’s 0.0019%. Being charitable, let’s say 135 and 11 deaths aren’t part of the same dataset and are additive. 146 people. 146 people died either with or from the Rona in that part of England March 20-Jan 21, again, supposedly including the ‘deadly’ winter period.
0.025% or the other way around, a survival rate of 99.6% rounded up pessimistically. Sounds a heck of a lot like official CDC and English ONS IFR (infection fatality ratio) numbers of 0.005% & 0.003% respectively. Let’s go all dinosaur fake news fear porn media with the ‘grim milestone’ with the worst case scenario 0.054%, a 94.6% survival rate. That’s for 70+ years. (Source: CDC Scenario 5)
Back to the original Q about ages, health conditions of patients admitted into Canadian hospitals with the “Rona”:
I’m going to look into that. And the data will show either:
Ah, the fabled Indian/delta variant. A mutation the health Poohbahs in BC/ON for Eg, are so sure to be befalling people. Which raises 2 questions:
Oh but the holy lanced are only fully protected after 14 days! Okay, so no possibility of adverse reactions causing the hospitalizations? Perhaps the powers that be should be making sure of that eh? First do no harm and all that. What would the harm be?
It’s not like Pfizer /Moderna make billions out of this and exiting treatments like HCQ, Regeneron and an inhaled corticosteroid bidesimide that cost pennies or a few bucks might have anything to do with it.
Anyway. I digress. I’ll endeavour to look that info up about patient ages and current diseases and get back to this forum. Meanwhile, you are free to do the same.
After all, for a disease so ‘deadly’ and ‘terrifying’ one would imagine you want to find out yourself right?
However, if you got the double double, you have nothing to worry about. All is well.