That's your Hollywood version. If you're completely unwilling to acknowledge or simply ignorant of how the truth is manipulated during a "crisis" there's no point trying to reason with you. Canada went through this before, during WW1 and WW2. In particular you can educate yourself about government control of "the message" during WW1 by researching somebody named Ernest J. Chambers.
No fair dodging. When the data comes in and the study authors have their numbers, how do you propose that the results are changed to suit your narrative?
I suspect you don't know how much documentation there is on these studies as they progress. To imagine that they're being subverted somehow is to admit you think Mission Impossible movies are documentaries.
That's your Hollywood version. If you're completely unwilling to acknowledge or simply ignorant of how the truth is manipulated during a "crisis" there's no point trying to reason with you. Canada went through this before, during WW1 and WW2. In particular you can educate yourself about government control of "the message" during WW1 by researching somebody named Ernest J. Chambers.
No fair dodging. When the data comes in and the study authors have their numbers, how do you propose that the results are changed to suit your narrative?
I suspect you don't know how much documentation there is on these studies as they progress. To imagine that they're being subverted somehow is to admit you think Mission Impossible movies are documentaries.