I read the other day that there are "archivists" collecting accounts of people's experiences during the pandemic for future generations. I'm hoping they also objectively collect tens of thousands of social media posts by very low risk people panicking and demanding to be vaccinated before most people aged 65+ could even get their first dose.
That page is talking specifically about older people, and does not concern itself with anyone else. It references footnote 2 as the source of its numbers. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310079201. That page has the numbers for all ages.
If you go there and adjust the reference period to 2020-01-01 to 2021-01-01, and then total the excess mortality numbers for ages 0 to 64 you'll see that deaths in that age range were 5854 higher than expected.
You missed the part about dementia being the main comorbidity. Yes let's give psychological trauma to children so a 90 year old can drool into a cup for an extra year.
"There was little variation in weekly deaths between 2020 and the prior five years for individuals younger than 65 years of age. Similar patterns were observed for women and men"
Did you miss this part retard? Variations, as in the increase is not statistically significant.
You need to pay closer attention. Your quote is referring to Figure 2: "Figure 2 compares the weekly death counts in Canada in 2020 to the average weekly death counts from 2015 to 2019 for people less than 65 years of age".
When you look at the graph comparing the two you can see that except for three weeks total in February and March of 2020 the number of deaths in people under 65 dying in 2020 is always higher than the in 2015-2019. Select the "Figure 2: Text Description" option and look at the spreadsheet.
And it is mostly higher by a hundred or more. For all but a few weeks of the year. That's where the extra 5000+ in 2020 in people under 65 comes from that is reported in the tables on the page I mentioned earlier, the one that has the figures your page's report is based on: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310079201
"There was little variation in weekly deaths
The "little variation" they are referring to has to do with the fact that the graph lines are closer together than for the over 65 victims, not that there is no difference as you seem to be claiming.
There were over 5000 excess deaths in people under 65 in 2020. You can believe none of them were from covid if you want to.
The number of COVID-19 attributed deaths do not account for all excess mortality during this period; therefore, other factors such as delays in seeking and accessing treatment and worsening of the overdose crisis have also likely contributed to the excess mortality.
The number of COVID-19 attributed deaths do not account for all excess mortality during this period; therefore, other factors such as delays in seeking and accessing treatment and worsening of the overdose crisis have also likely contributed to the excess mortality.
Is that an opinion of yours? Or is that a quote I'm supposed to go hunting for?
No Increase in Excess deaths Under 65 in 2020
Does that mean the excess deaths in 2020 were the same as the excess deaths in 2019? I might have misread it. I thought you were saying that the death rate among people under 65 in 2020 was not unexpectedly high.
I read the other day that there are "archivists" collecting accounts of people's experiences during the pandemic for future generations. I'm hoping they also objectively collect tens of thousands of social media posts by very low risk people panicking and demanding to be vaccinated before most people aged 65+ could even get their first dose.
The Salem witch trials of our generation
https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/epidemiological-economic-research-data/excess-mortality-impacts-age-comorbidity.html
MUH SCAMDEMIC!!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEE
Wrong. There were 5854 excess deaths under 65 in 2020.
The title of OP's page is "COVID-19 and deaths in older Canadians: Excess mortality and the impacts of age and comorbidity" https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/epidemiological-economic-research-data/excess-mortality-impacts-age-comorbidity.html
That page is talking specifically about older people, and does not concern itself with anyone else. It references footnote 2 as the source of its numbers. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310079201. That page has the numbers for all ages.
If you go there and adjust the reference period to 2020-01-01 to 2021-01-01, and then total the excess mortality numbers for ages 0 to 64 you'll see that deaths in that age range were 5854 higher than expected.
Lol mainly due to the restrictions and opioid deaths.
Jeez shut down the entire nation because an extra 6k died......akin to a bad flu season.
FFS you're a moron, the pandemic of the century = 6k extra deaths from the actual pandemic restrictions and not the pandemic.
Your own link says 16,333 extra people died last year. Your ability to ignore the old people should be troubling to the people around you.
You missed the part about dementia being the main comorbidity. Yes let's give psychological trauma to children so a 90 year old can drool into a cup for an extra year.
Your headline reads "No Increase in Excess deaths Under 65 in 2020"
That's wrong, because in fact in 2020 almost 6,000 extra deaths occurred in people under 65.
If you now want to talk about old people and dementia maybe you should make a post with the right headline and start over.
"There was little variation in weekly deaths between 2020 and the prior five years for individuals younger than 65 years of age. Similar patterns were observed for women and men"
Did you miss this part retard? Variations, as in the increase is not statistically significant.
You need to pay closer attention. Your quote is referring to Figure 2: "Figure 2 compares the weekly death counts in Canada in 2020 to the average weekly death counts from 2015 to 2019 for people less than 65 years of age".
When you look at the graph comparing the two you can see that except for three weeks total in February and March of 2020 the number of deaths in people under 65 dying in 2020 is always higher than the in 2015-2019. Select the "Figure 2: Text Description" option and look at the spreadsheet.
And it is mostly higher by a hundred or more. For all but a few weeks of the year. That's where the extra 5000+ in 2020 in people under 65 comes from that is reported in the tables on the page I mentioned earlier, the one that has the figures your page's report is based on: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310079201
The "little variation" they are referring to has to do with the fact that the graph lines are closer together than for the over 65 victims, not that there is no difference as you seem to be claiming.
There were over 5000 excess deaths in people under 65 in 2020. You can believe none of them were from covid if you want to.
The number of COVID-19 attributed deaths do not account for all excess mortality during this period; therefore, other factors such as delays in seeking and accessing treatment and worsening of the overdose crisis have also likely contributed to the excess mortality.
Is that an opinion of yours? Or is that a quote I'm supposed to go hunting for?
Does that mean the excess deaths in 2020 were the same as the excess deaths in 2019? I might have misread it. I thought you were saying that the death rate among people under 65 in 2020 was not unexpectedly high.
Why don't you read the actual report first before asking stupid questions.