You say "they could have done it different" but provide nothing else.
You should be very concerned that out medical system (apparently) can't cope with a "new" virus that has a 99.99% survival rate.
I gather you're not a taxpayer. Taxpayers would be screaming themselves to death if they had to pay for a system that stood around waiting for global pandemics.
99.99% survival
That number is only valid if you include the people who don't get the virus, so it's pretty much useless. Look at the "Closed Cases" box on the following web page and grade school math will show you that of the people who test positive for the virus globally, one in fifty dies. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
You say "they could have done it different" but provide nothing else.
I gather you're not a taxpayer. Taxpayers would be screaming themselves to death if they had to pay for a system that stood around waiting for global pandemics.
That number is only valid if you include the people who don't get the virus, so it's pretty much useless. Look at the "Closed Cases" box on the following web page and grade school math will show you that of the people who test positive for the virus globally, one in fifty dies. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/