So right off the bat you're quoting a discredited source and spreading misinformation. Getting all butthurt about it is just a failure to recognize that you have been called out on your lack of relevant background and subsequent shitposting, even if you see yourself as some sort of seeker after truth.
Nothing wrong with seeking truth. You just need a couple of advanced degrees in the relevant fields, and then there's not much chance you'll be supporting the Great Barrington Declaration.
You care little for the truth and are only here to push the big pharma narrative. To be honest I'm surprised Ham hasn't banned you as he has banned better people for less..
You seek to discredit honest scientists and doctors who only want the truth and what is best for society. Instead you only respond to vax threads and try to write everyone off as an idiot who isn't on your level, yet all you do is repeat the big pharma/IMF talking points. Interesting to note that both the liberal government and pharmaceutical companies have had job openings to be an online warrior against "vaccine hesitancy?
So the real question here is who pays your salary to post this narrative online? The federal government or the pharma companies?
Some would say "Quit Your Bullshit"
You fail to mention that the epidemiologist you refer to (https://brownstone.org/articles/a-review-and-autopsy-of-two-covid-immunity-studies) is an author of the Great Barrington Declaration (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Barrington_Declaration), which promotes herd immunity as the overall defense strategy against covid, and which fails to recognize the speed at which the covid virus spreads among an unprotected western population and which fails to adequately consider the difficulty of isolating/protecting the vulnerable.
So right off the bat you're quoting a discredited source and spreading misinformation. Getting all butthurt about it is just a failure to recognize that you have been called out on your lack of relevant background and subsequent shitposting, even if you see yourself as some sort of seeker after truth.
Nothing wrong with seeking truth. You just need a couple of advanced degrees in the relevant fields, and then there's not much chance you'll be supporting the Great Barrington Declaration.
You care little for the truth and are only here to push the big pharma narrative. To be honest I'm surprised Ham hasn't banned you as he has banned better people for less..
You seek to discredit honest scientists and doctors who only want the truth and what is best for society. Instead you only respond to vax threads and try to write everyone off as an idiot who isn't on your level, yet all you do is repeat the big pharma/IMF talking points. Interesting to note that both the liberal government and pharmaceutical companies have had job openings to be an online warrior against "vaccine hesitancy?
So the real question here is who pays your salary to post this narrative online? The federal government or the pharma companies?
Neither you nor I have the technical background to determine the truth about SARS-CoV-2 so it becomes a question of who we choose to listen to.
I choose to listen to the overwhelming majority of the people in the field who are qualified to express an opinion.
You choose to listen to others.
You sound like the German people of 39 that chose to listen to the majority
They listened to a political party, not infectious disease and public health experts.
You sound like the German people of 39 that chose to listen to the majority
They listened to a political party, not infectious disease and public health experts.
You need to read up on false dichotomies: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=false+dichotomy&t=h_&ia=definition