Blood vessels in muscles are called capillaries and they are about 10 microns in diameter. That's 0.0004" or four ten thousandths of an inch. (https://www.britannica.com/science/capillary) That's about half the diameter of a human hair. Far too small for a vaccine needle to pierce because the needle is 50 times bigger.
I'm not hearing anything from you about how I'm wrong other than your unsupported opinion. Give me some links to studies or journal articles about your claim of problems with the vaccine being injected into the blood stream instead of muscle tissue.
Still just your word on that. If google searches are so easy you shouldn't have any trouble coming up with a link to support your claim of problems with the vaccine being injected into the blood stream instead of muscle tissue.
You are going to need to provide evidence that that happens.
When medication is to be delivered into the bloodstream it is commonly injected into a vein on the inside of the elbow. Unlike that, these vaccine are injected into the muscle of the upper arm because it's the best place for activating the immune system. https://theconversation.com/why-do-we-get-shots-in-the-arm-its-all-about-the-muscle-161259
Blood vessels in muscles are called capillaries and they are about 10 microns in diameter. That's 0.0004" or four ten thousandths of an inch. (https://www.britannica.com/science/capillary) That's about half the diameter of a human hair. Far too small for a vaccine needle to pierce because the needle is 50 times bigger.
And as I pointed out earlier your own link says "The blood clots, according to experts, are incredibly rare, appearing in one of every 250,000 receivers of the vaccine and causing only one death in a million AstraZeneca vaccine takers" https://www.google.com/amp/s/nationalpost.com/news/canada/adenovirus-in-astrazeneca-vaccine-behind-trigger-for-extremely-rare-blood-clots-scientists/wcm/b1d1e0df-8989-41b0-a029-875585bfb5ec/amp/
Are you really this stupid?
I'm not hearing anything from you about how I'm wrong other than your unsupported opinion. Give me some links to studies or journal articles about your claim of problems with the vaccine being injected into the blood stream instead of muscle tissue.
You can really just google it yourself. It's to the point now of being indisputable.
Still just your word on that. If google searches are so easy you shouldn't have any trouble coming up with a link to support your claim of problems with the vaccine being injected into the blood stream instead of muscle tissue.
Sure, sure. I understand. The Internet is just full of support for your statements but you just (yawn) can't bring yourself to produce any.
I'm sure I've quoted Hitchens to you before: "That which is "That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence."