Keeping virus spreaders away from sick people.makes a certain amount of sense. Must be really important if they do it when the healthcare system is already stressed.
Meanwhile, you continue to ignore all the breakthrough cases in your spreader thesis which should conclude that the vaxxed are the real spreaders. But it's OK to be a spreader if you're morally superior. Because, you know, science.
The vaxxed are less of a threat to the vulnerable. They are "two-thirds less likely to be asymptomatic", carry viral loads for less time, and shed a weaker form of the virus. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2786040. The vulnerable should be exposed only to the vaxxed if possible.
the vaxxed are the real spreaders.
The vaxxed are less likely to go to the hospital when they are sick, thus reducing the load on the healthcare system. Go to https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data and look at how the few unvaxxed are proportionally taking up so many more hospital and ICU beds.
Keeping virus spreaders away from sick people.makes a certain amount of sense. Must be really important if they do it when the healthcare system is already stressed.
Meanwhile, you continue to ignore all the breakthrough cases in your spreader thesis which should conclude that the vaxxed are the real spreaders. But it's OK to be a spreader if you're morally superior. Because, you know, science.
The vaxxed are less of a threat to the vulnerable. They are "two-thirds less likely to be asymptomatic", carry viral loads for less time, and shed a weaker form of the virus. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2786040. The vulnerable should be exposed only to the vaxxed if possible.
The vaxxed are less likely to go to the hospital when they are sick, thus reducing the load on the healthcare system. Go to https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data and look at how the few unvaxxed are proportionally taking up so many more hospital and ICU beds.