Re the dinosaur media thing about most folk in ICU's and hospitals are unjabbed.
Ok, so let's say we trust this stat from the gov.... cough. Questions:
The country is at or nearing 90% jabbed. I crunched thru the numbers based on demographics and age groups from census data a while back in a post some weeks ago, IIRC around 300-500k people who are elderly remain unjabbed (the ones that are dynig in high numbers- according to BC CDC numbers)
If we are at 90% jabbed and the unjabbed are shrinking by the day, at what point does the argument that the unjabbed are taking all the room up in the hospitals start to get silly?
Are we seriously going to argue that at 95% jabbed (theoretically here) say, that the remaining 5% are children 10 and under, are clogging up hospitals?
Is there data showing of these allegedly unjabbed in hospitals, their ages, number of comorbidities?
How is the various provincial govs defining what 'unjabbed' actually means? IIRC there was some shell game a while back about it wasnt considered a jabbed patient if they had it done 2 weeks prior, and that they were still considered unjabbed, AFTER they were admitted, even if they were in the hospitals for WEEKS.
If they are 'testing' these patients to look for the dreaded Megatron, sorry...omicron, what are they testing them with?
A: PCR? Hasnt that test been effectivley given the heave ho by the CDC in recent weeks? Something not approved or somesuch?
B: PCR test allegedly cannot tell the difference between one coronavirus (say, a cold) and another - say influenza B.
C: If the medical workers and lab workers physically testing all these allegedly 'infected' patients, scores a day perhaps, and the virus is so deadly and infectous etc, how come they arent sick? Where's the data showing how many testers come down with the kung flu?
Re the dinosaur media thing about most folk in ICU's and hospitals are unjabbed.
Ok, so let's say we trust this stat from the gov.... cough. Questions:
If we are at 90% jabbed and the unjabbed are shrinking by the day, at what point does the argument that the unjabbed are taking all the room up in the hospitals start to get silly?
Are we seriously going to argue that at 95% jabbed (theoretically here) say, that the remaining 5% are children 10 and under, are clogging up hospitals?
Is there data showing of these allegedly unjabbed in hospitals, their ages, number of comorbidities?
How is the various provincial govs defining what 'unjabbed' actually means? IIRC there was some shell game a while back about it wasnt considered a jabbed patient if they had it done 2 weeks prior, and that they were still considered unjabbed, AFTER they were admitted, even if they were in the hospitals for WEEKS.
If they are 'testing' these patients to look for the dreaded Megatron, sorry...omicron, what are they testing them with? A: PCR? Hasnt that test been effectivley given the heave ho by the CDC in recent weeks? Something not approved or somesuch? B: PCR test allegedly cannot tell the difference between one coronavirus (say, a cold) and another - say influenza B. C: If the medical workers and lab workers physically testing all these allegedly 'infected' patients, scores a day perhaps, and the virus is so deadly and infectous etc, how come they arent sick? Where's the data showing how many testers come down with the kung flu?