To begin I repeat: Omicron has outstripped the ability to count cases, so any numbers on those two graphs are much less reliable in the last month or so. I believe you know this, but if not here are a few links: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=covid+case+count+uncertainty&t=h_&ia=web
On the left is a proportion, which says that on a per capita basis - proportionally, that is - over the last five months, there have been more cases counted among unvaccinated people than among those with two doses of vaccine.
On the right are case counts which show that at the peak - on one day around the end of last year - about 14,000 fully vaccinated people tested positive for covid and about 2,000 unvaccinated people tested positive. I don't have a link for historical data but at that time there were about 7 times as many vaccinated people as unvaccinated, so 14K to 2 K seems about right, since Omicron had arrived and it seemed to be racing through both the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations at about the same speed, although that was more of a guess because - as it seems necessary to keep repeating - Omicron outstripped the counting mechanisms.
So there's no conflict between your two graphs, shaky as they are due to the counting problem.
You can go directly to Ontario's official site and toggle between total cases and per 100,000. I already mentioned this, but of course it's easier for you to ignore this.
You're the only one I know comparing a proportion to a count and saying they don't agree.
I’m only comparing a proportion to a count if you selectively hear only a portion of what i say, which i know you’re doing on purpose.
This is your link: https://imgur.com/a/qFOram3
To begin I repeat: Omicron has outstripped the ability to count cases, so any numbers on those two graphs are much less reliable in the last month or so. I believe you know this, but if not here are a few links: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=covid+case+count+uncertainty&t=h_&ia=web
On the left is a proportion, which says that on a per capita basis - proportionally, that is - over the last five months, there have been more cases counted among unvaccinated people than among those with two doses of vaccine.
On the right are case counts which show that at the peak - on one day around the end of last year - about 14,000 fully vaccinated people tested positive for covid and about 2,000 unvaccinated people tested positive. I don't have a link for historical data but at that time there were about 7 times as many vaccinated people as unvaccinated, so 14K to 2 K seems about right, since Omicron had arrived and it seemed to be racing through both the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations at about the same speed, although that was more of a guess because - as it seems necessary to keep repeating - Omicron outstripped the counting mechanisms.
So there's no conflict between your two graphs, shaky as they are due to the counting problem.
You can go directly to Ontario's official site and toggle between total cases and per 100,000. I already mentioned this, but of course it's easier for you to ignore this.
Now we're just going around in circles.
Funny your never complained about this until officials announced they could no longer maintain whatever claim they might have been able to make about the accuracy of case counts. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=ontario+case+counts+no+longer+very+accurate.&t=h_&ia=web
Officials: "Omicron is outstripping our ability to count cases accurately."
You: "Now they're lying to us about their counts."