Accuracy of case counts is your deflection now? If you know anything at all about statistics, as you make yourself out to know, you'll know that there are more than enough cases reported to accurately measure proportion of infections within a tiny margin of error. It's called the law of large numbers.
And, I never complained about this before because this is a recent phenomenon. Ratio of vaccinated cases surpassed unvaccinated in mid-December and has been the case every day since then.
Accuracy of case counts is your deflection now? If you know anything at all about statistics, as you make yourself out to know, you'll know that there are more than enough cases reported to accurately measure proportion of infections within a tiny margin of error. It's called the law of large numbers.
And, I never complained about this before because this is a recent phenomenon. Ratio of vaccinated cases surpassed unvaccinated in mid-December and has been the case every day since then.
Well, it corresponds with your sudden concern...
You have posted a bunch of links in this discussion. Is there one that says all of what you are trying to say? Two?
https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data/hospitalizations
https://covid19-sciencetable.ca/ontario-dashboard/
https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data
https://postimg.cc/sGFgbzD9
https://postimg.cc/21pcGyd0
https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data/case-numbers-and-spread
https://imgbb.com/PzXC9sF
https://imgur.com/a/qFOram3
And you keep deflecting some more…
This is your way of saying you're finished discussing it.
No. You deflected. This is your way of changing the topic.