Supporting my suspicions that not everything I read in OmegaCanada is the simple unvarnished truth, and that sometimes some "interpretation" has been applied in the post's headline, or in the he said that they said that those people said chain, I repeat the first sentence of the article's discussion:
"The overall rate of false-positive results among the total rapid antigen test screens for SARS-CoV-2 was very low, consistent with other, smaller studies. The cluster of false-positive results from 1 batch was likely the result of manufacturing issues rather than implementation."
I just thought I would pick that out of the wall of text in OP's post, so it didn't get lost.
If you would like to read the article yourself rather than what OP said the Epoch Times said about it, it's here: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788067
Supporting my suspicions that not everything I read in OmegaCanada is the simple unvarnished truth, and that sometimes some "interpretation" has been applied in the post's headline, or in the he said that they said that those people said chain, I repeat the first sentence of the article's discussion:
"The overall rate of false-positive results among the total rapid antigen test screens for SARS-CoV-2 was very low, consistent with other, smaller studies. The cluster of false-positive results from 1 batch was likely the result of manufacturing issues rather than implementation."
I just thought I would pick that out of the wall of text in OP's post, so it didn't get lost.