The Johns Hopkins study is being criticized by scientists and that's a good thing. That's how science is done. I mean, that's how science was done before covid.
But... this study was not initially picked up by the mainstream media. Now that some scientists are questioning it, mainstream media will finally run it.
You know what else some scientists question - Mandatory covid vaccines. But they're not allowed to say anything for fear of being cancelled and losing their livelihood.
Questioning "science" is good, but it should be a two-way street.
Please explain to me, in your infinite wisdom, why an meta-analysis of various other studies and drawing of conclusion needs to be done by medical experts? It was done by the John Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health and the Study of Business Enterprise. You actually have to be mentally retarded to not see how the authors have subject matter expertise to perform research.
As for the data sources broad enough? I don't even know what the fuck that means. Read the study. They looked at over 1000 peer-reviewed studies and filtered to those that they could draw conclusions.
The problem with mRNA junkies like you, is that you cannot fathom, that people outside of white coats are able to form a conclusion on the cost vs. benefits of COVID-19 measures.
Why are you here anyways? Clearly you masturbate coming here and a bunch of folks telling you to fuck off.
Reading your text makes us lose brain cells. We are all stupider for having a conversation with you.
You must be fun at parties. "Wow, it looks like it's raining" "SIR. ARE YOU A METEOROLOGIST? HOW DO YOU KNOW ITS RAINING? YOU'RE LOOKING AT A PRE-PRINT STUDY. WWAAH. I WANT ATTENTION BECAUSE MY MOMMY DIDN'T GIVE ME ANY AND DADDY HIT ME"
Take your welfare dollars and actually do something meaningful with your life you invertebrate.
The Johns Hopkins study is being criticized by scientists and that's a good thing. That's how science is done. I mean, that's how science was done before covid.
But... this study was not initially picked up by the mainstream media. Now that some scientists are questioning it, mainstream media will finally run it.
You know what else some scientists question - Mandatory covid vaccines. But they're not allowed to say anything for fear of being cancelled and losing their livelihood.
Questioning "science" is good, but it should be a two-way street.
Are you married in your fantasy world?
Why are you gay?
Maybe they have a checklist or a points system.
Is it peer reviewed?
Is it by medical experts?
Are the data sources broad enough?
Three "No" answers? It isn't news yet.
Yes, the media is only reporting on peer-reviewed studies in 2022. Are you living in clown world or are you just the biggest retard on the planet?
You may be a little foggy on the idea of a checklist. It involves looking at a number of factors and making a decision based on the overall picture.
You might be a little foggy about reality.
Just sayin' there's more than one factor in a checklist.
Hey Pfizer fanboy. Good to see you here again.
Please explain to me, in your infinite wisdom, why an meta-analysis of various other studies and drawing of conclusion needs to be done by medical experts? It was done by the John Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health and the Study of Business Enterprise. You actually have to be mentally retarded to not see how the authors have subject matter expertise to perform research.
As for the data sources broad enough? I don't even know what the fuck that means. Read the study. They looked at over 1000 peer-reviewed studies and filtered to those that they could draw conclusions.
The problem with mRNA junkies like you, is that you cannot fathom, that people outside of white coats are able to form a conclusion on the cost vs. benefits of COVID-19 measures.
Why are you here anyways? Clearly you masturbate coming here and a bunch of folks telling you to fuck off.
Reading your text makes us lose brain cells. We are all stupider for having a conversation with you.
You must be fun at parties. "Wow, it looks like it's raining" "SIR. ARE YOU A METEOROLOGIST? HOW DO YOU KNOW ITS RAINING? YOU'RE LOOKING AT A PRE-PRINT STUDY. WWAAH. I WANT ATTENTION BECAUSE MY MOMMY DIDN'T GIVE ME ANY AND DADDY HIT ME"
Take your welfare dollars and actually do something meaningful with your life you invertebrate.
He was upset the MSM didn't cover the study when it came out. I thought they might have a system for making the decision. Sorry to trigger you.
I demolish your position and your response is "sorry to trigger you".
LOL. I'm glad your 10 year lesbian dance theory degree paid off.
How many national media operations do you oversee?
Oh. None. I see.
I guess you know as much about it as OP.