Except that what I'm posting is backed up by every organization in the world made up of people who are trained and experienced in infectious diseases and public health.
You, on the other hand, have nothing but your own untrained and inexperienced self and its tiny brain. And you feel that qualifies you to argue - all on your own except for unattributed pictures from the Internet - with the conclusions of experts in the relevant fields.
As though your lack of education, training, and experience was some sort of qualification.
If you're old enough to own anything complicated I assume you refuse to take it to a trained technician for repairs, and prefer to do it yourself. How's that working out for you?
Why are you refusing to shield the elderly, obese or frail patients from sick and infected Covid positive nurses and doctors who work in direct contact with the vulnerable. Explain with science. - TUCHODI REFUSES TO ANSWER.
The #1 key predictor for myocarditis, stroke and brain bleed in healthy boys and men is a recent mRNA vaccine. Break down the current CARDIAC ICU occupancy rate by age group and by vaccine status - TUCHODI REFUSES TO ANSWER.
You are very dim witted. And the proof is in your inability to to use reason, math and science. Very embarrassing for you.
Given your refusal to acknowledge that all you have is opinions, with no science to back them up, I doubt you understand the meaning of the word 'embarrassing'.
If you want to provide some links to show that what you're saying has some application in the real world, I will see if I can find some science that would explain it for you.
Thanks for confirming you are unable to use logic to explain why you endorse sick covid nurses, who are fully vaccinated, in direct contact with old, obese and frail patients.
Thank you for confirming you are incapable to explain your endorsement of this.
sick covid nurses, who are fully vaccinated, in direct contact with old, obese and frail patients.
So far all we have is your word that this is happening. Maybe it is exactly as you say, and maybe it is not. How about providing a starting point that is more than your opinion.
Except that what I'm posting is backed up by every organization in the world made up of people who are trained and experienced in infectious diseases and public health.
You, on the other hand, have nothing but your own untrained and inexperienced self and its tiny brain. And you feel that qualifies you to argue - all on your own except for unattributed pictures from the Internet - with the conclusions of experts in the relevant fields.
As though your lack of education, training, and experience was some sort of qualification.
If you're old enough to own anything complicated I assume you refuse to take it to a trained technician for repairs, and prefer to do it yourself. How's that working out for you?
Why are you refusing to shield the elderly, obese or frail patients from sick and infected Covid positive nurses and doctors who work in direct contact with the vulnerable. Explain with science. - TUCHODI REFUSES TO ANSWER.
The #1 key predictor for myocarditis, stroke and brain bleed in healthy boys and men is a recent mRNA vaccine. Break down the current CARDIAC ICU occupancy rate by age group and by vaccine status - TUCHODI REFUSES TO ANSWER.
You are very dim witted. And the proof is in your inability to to use reason, math and science. Very embarrassing for you.
Given your refusal to acknowledge that all you have is opinions, with no science to back them up, I doubt you understand the meaning of the word 'embarrassing'.
If you want to provide some links to show that what you're saying has some application in the real world, I will see if I can find some science that would explain it for you.
Thanks for confirming you are unable to use logic to explain why you endorse sick covid nurses, who are fully vaccinated, in direct contact with old, obese and frail patients.
Thank you for confirming you are incapable to explain your endorsement of this.
So far all we have is your word that this is happening. Maybe it is exactly as you say, and maybe it is not. How about providing a starting point that is more than your opinion.